Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
PeterChenoweth #202004 03/26/08 03:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
...and you get to define "necessary", right?

Sweet.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
tomtuttle #202010 03/26/08 03:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
B
local
Offline
local
B
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
Just last year I bought a couple of M2's to serve as the rear surrounds in my 7.1 set-up. I thought that 4 QS8's would be overkill and when someone suggested M2's I jumped at that scenario. I'm glad I did. The rear surrounds do make a difference in certain scenes, and 7.1 Blu-ray disks like 3:10 to Yuma are amazing. One scene during the stagecoach robbery has a bullet travel from the right main and ricochet from the left QS8 to the rear M2. Once you hear a good 7.1 set-up, you won't go back.


"Not throwing my hands up or my dress above my ears don't mean I ain't awestruck." Al Swearengen
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
Bayne #202014 03/26/08 04:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
N
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
N
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
My room is only 12 feet wide with the qs8's on the side walls. I was considering 2 m2's as rear surrounds but was thinking that my room is two narrow to really make good use of them. How wide is your room? Also, in a 7.1 setup should you move your qs8's from slightly behind the listening position to right at the side of the listening position to take advantage of the m2's as rear surrounds?

- Nick

Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
Nick B #202016 03/26/08 04:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
B
local
Offline
local
B
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
My room is 13.5 feet wide and I have the QS8's positioned beside the listening position. The QS8's are wall mounted and the M2's are hung from the ceiling. I've found that the direct radiating M2's as rears complement the QS8's perfectly.

Last edited by Bayne; 03/26/08 04:25 PM.

"Not throwing my hands up or my dress above my ears don't mean I ain't awestruck." Al Swearengen
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
tomtuttle #202020 03/26/08 05:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
 Originally Posted By: tomtuttle
...and you get to define "necessary", right?

Sweet.


Of course!


M80v2 | VP150v2 | QS8v2
SVS Pci+ 20-39
Emotiva UMC-1 & LPA-1
M22ti + T-Amp, in the Office
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
Bayne #202138 03/27/08 01:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
N
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
N
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
The only concern I have with putting the surrounds right next to the listening position is that most dvd's are 5.1 rather than 6.1 or 7.1. So when I am using 5.1, the surrounds will be not in the optimal position (ie a couple feet above and behind the sweet spot). However, there is an option to extend 5.1 to a processed 6.1 for regular dvd's (using dts neo 6 or dolby pxl II?). But, are there options such as these on newer receivers with the new audio codecs such as dolby true hd? What is mean is can I extend dolby true hd 5.1 to 6.1 with some processing on the new recievers while keeping it uncompressed? Also, what if I have uncompressed 5.1 pcm...Is there a way to extend this to 6.1 without downconverting it to lossy first?

- Nick

Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
Nick B #202153 03/27/08 02:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
B
local
Offline
local
B
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
I have a new Denon AVR-3808CI--great, great receiver. With the Audessey calibration it knows where I sit and how many speakers I have. It'll convert 5.1 to 6.1 or 7.1 with no problem, if that's what you mean.


"Not throwing my hands up or my dress above my ears don't mean I ain't awestruck." Al Swearengen
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
Bayne #202156 03/27/08 03:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
When using native 5.1 source, you can use Dolby EX to extend signal to 6.1 or 7.1 without touching the front channels.


See Mojo's signature
Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
EFalardeau #202168 03/27/08 05:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
N
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
N
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
But, what about the new high def formats. If I have 5.1 pcm uncompressed (or dolby true hd or dts master audio) is it possible to convert it to 6.1 or 7.1 inside of the receiver (or blu ray player) and still keep it lossless?

Re: Review: Finally replaced m22 surrounds with QS
Nick B #202172 03/27/08 06:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
It's all converted to PCM before any of the DSP problems and chips are applied (including bass management). So, whether the source was lossy or not, those portions of your receiver will not see the diffence (but your ears just might!) \:\)


See Mojo's signature
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 945 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4