Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Buying an older receiver
#202607 03/30/08 09:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
OK, I've been considering my options and I think the most expedient way to get a pair of M80s into my livingroom is to look for a used receiver as a short term solution.

I,m not sure what I can reasonably expect to pay, but was hoping to keep it at or below $150.

I'm currently looking at a Yamaha RXV1050 and am curious as to what something in the specs means:
Dynamic Power per channel (by IHF dynamic headroom measuring method) 8/8ohms 160w/190w

Jason. I will look into ecost.com as suggested in the other thread.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202614 03/30/08 11:09 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
Once you settle on a model or two, I'd recommend you check eBay as well if you are comfortable shopping there. I bought a used Pioneer receiver from eBay several years ago and it has served me well (and continues to, seven years later). Just make sure if you go that way that you find someone with a high feedback rating so you know you're dealing with someone honest.


Epic 80-800: HG Cherry
Re: Buying an older receiver
myrison #202618 03/30/08 11:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Just missed out on an older Yami because I've forgotten my password. I use ebay about once every 1.5 years.

I don't know that I put much stock in the rating system because sellers are able to 'rate' a purchasor. I've heard a number of stories on retailatory ratings.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202624 03/31/08 12:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
You should check some of the older threads for Onkyo's as well. I know JohnK usually sends people to one site for refurbs but I can't remember it nor desire to look it up\:\)


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Buying an older receiver
jakewash #202626 03/31/08 12:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
You can get an Onkyo 505 refurb for about that price at accessories4less.com


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202630 03/31/08 01:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
 Originally Posted By: fredk

I don't know that I put much stock in the rating system because sellers are able to 'rate' a purchasor. I've heard a number of stories on retailatory ratings.


Definitely valid, but sellers with hundreds or thousands of positive ratings still paint a good enough picture in my book. I tend to steer clear of anyone whose feedback shows that they've had the same complaint multiple times... (i.e. non-responsive, item not as described, etc.). If buyers leave that kind of feedback more than once, especially knowing that they'll likely earn a negative feedback themselves from the seller, it's an indication to look elsewhere.

E-bay commentary over, back to audio talk. \:\)

PS: I'm surprised no one here has volunteered to sell you some of their own older equipment. This seems like the kind of crowd who has 2-3 old receivers around the house without a defined purpose... (or, if everyone is like me, we don't have a purpose for them now, but know that sooner or later we'll buy enough speakers to need another receiver!)


Epic 80-800: HG Cherry
Re: Buying an older receiver
myrison #202632 03/31/08 01:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 257
local
Offline
local
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 257
Sorry, but my old Denon receiver is destined for my screened room, once the budget allows for some Alqs. A SB3 is already in position for this; so the entire CD collection as well as std radio on tap \:\)


Mark
Pio 94,SB3,BD30,A35,Pio 48AV.Pronto 7000 controlling all. Getting ready for 22s, 150 & QS8s.
Re: Buying an older receiver
tomtuttle #202634 03/31/08 01:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Checked the refurbed Onkyos out. US only. I didn't see a 505, but the 504 is only 75w/channel.

Jason, you mentioned that you have used ecost. What are the shipping charges like into Canada?


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202636 03/31/08 02:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I bought my PF60 from them and the shipping costs for that unit wasn't too bad, I don't remember the exact cost, but it was about $70. However I just tried to 'purchase' some receivers from them and they all stated it wasn't possible to Canada, looks like the protectionist economy style of thinking is starting to take over. although I could still get the PF60 sent up.

I just looked at amazon.com and they have a Yamaha RXV461 shipped:
Items: $215.96
Shipping & Handling: $120.10

Total Before Tax: $336.06
Estimated Tax:* $0.00

Order Total: $336.06
Which I think isn't too bad. Funny thing is it is from 6ave. and if you go to 6ave they won't ship up here but Amazon will!

Last edited by jakewash; 03/31/08 02:32 AM. Reason: new info

Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202637 03/31/08 02:36 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
No luck with Denon refurbs either. Canadians need not apply...


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202638 03/31/08 02:40 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Fred, dynamic power is a valid method of measuring amplifier output suggested by the IHF. It's measured by applying a tone burst for 20 milliseconds on and 480 milliseconds off every half second. The idea is that 20 milliseconds roughly corresponds to the length of a musical peak on a instrument, following which the sound level falls off. This tends to give a number about 20-30% higher than the continuous power rating which the FTC regulations require for amplifiers advertised in the U.S. The basic FTC requirement is at least two channels driven simultaneously at the full rated power for at least five minutes continuously.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202639 03/31/08 02:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
You beat me to it. I bet that restriction is placed on the refurb units by the manufacturer.

I think I can do better used locally with a little patience.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202643 03/31/08 04:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Johnk,

Do you, in your vast arsenal of audio knowledge, have a chart anywhere that illustrates the dynamic range of instruments?


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Buying an older receiver
JohnK #202644 03/31/08 04:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Vast arsenal indeed. I missed your reply while typing john.

I'll have to mull over what that means for a little while.

Thanks.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202645 03/31/08 04:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Basically it means that dynamic power is a secondary spec. To determine if an amp meets your application, look at continuously rated power.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Buying an older receiver
Mojo #202646 03/31/08 05:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
...and ignored entirely when thinking about amp headroom?


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202647 03/31/08 05:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
I'd ignore it entirely, yes. Because I doubt that composers obey the 20msec/480msec duty cycle spec \:\) .

Now of course if you found two amps that had the same specs, price, etc but one had higher dynamic power, buy that one. That's what I mean by a secondary spec.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Buying an older receiver
Mojo #202648 03/31/08 06:31 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Mo, there's an interesting(and pricey)book on musical instruments which can be examined in part by clicking the preview button here . For example, scrolling down to p.31 shows a chart of some instrument dynamic levels.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Buying an older receiver
Mojo #202649 03/31/08 10:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
Tex, you may want to research synthesizers as you would get pretty attack, sustain and release for each instruments. After you have the shape of the fundamental wave, the synthesizer will then add the harmonics and you will get a final waveform with peeks that can reach quite high, but for very, very brief periods.

"Dynamic range" can be used to many sauce and is sometimes used (quite often here in this forum) as the difference between the lowest sustain level and the highest one (the part our brains are actually registering as low/loud). It can also mean the difference between the highesr point in a waveform and 0db. The various definitions are all good, it's just a matter of using the one appropriate to your needs.

I am sure you can get simple synt programs on a PC to experiment.

You can also look at samples for Samplers as they may be more "real life" and easy to check with a wafeform viewer.


See Mojo's signature
Re: Buying an older receiver
EFalardeau #202687 03/31/08 06:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
 Quote:
"Dynamic range" can be used to many sauce

And I am sometimes wondering which sauce we are talking about.

Given that this stuff is defined and quantifiable one would think that it is well understood in the audiophile community, but it sometimes seems not.

I see head room numbers being quoted and they seem to contradict each other. For example to the folks at Crown, 6db headroom (from average) is nothing and is considered adequate only for compressed pop/rock music, yet I have seen it suggested here, by inference, that 6db amp headroom is just fine for all music.

I always think of headroom being the power available above the average C-weighted (thats the slow one isn't it?) spl measured when you are listening to a given piece of music.

 Quote:
...peeks that can reach quite high, but for very, very brief periods.

Can you quantify that at all? How high, how long, and can we hear it? Crown allows for short term inaudable clipping in their power recommendations, but they don't explain what that means.

Hmm... a brief (1 hour) sidetrack to do some internet searches suggests that we can indeed hear it (at least in theory). In fact, the speed of the attack is one of the auditory cues we use to determine what instrument it is we are listening to.

I would love to hear more on this from you Eric. I suspect you have done a lot of reading on the subject.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202904 04/02/08 04:56 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 28
R
hobbyist
Offline
hobbyist
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 28

Re: Buying an older receiver
rick240 #202925 04/02/08 01:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Scarberia? Is shipping from a distant solar system included in that price?


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Buying an older receiver
Mojo #202991 04/02/08 09:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Luckely I live in that distant solar system (otherwise known as Southern Ontario) so its just a short trip.

I'm still hung up on this idea that I need a minimum of 100wpc. Playing with one of the power calculators, I'm beginning to wonder, particularly for a temporary solution...


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202994 04/02/08 09:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
You most likely do need 100wpc. I listen to a half watt nominal and a 90W/ch amp is just right for 98% of the music I listen to. With some well-recorded classical pieces it's a different story. I could use a few hundred watts.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Buying an older receiver
Mojo #202997 04/02/08 10:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Well, if Mr. "1/2 watt" says I need 100wpc...

Back to the search.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #202999 04/02/08 10:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Yep. I guess you need a gigawatt then, eh \:\) ?


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Buying an older receiver
Mojo #203052 04/03/08 05:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
or one that goes to Eleven.


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Re: Buying an older receiver
fredk #203061 04/03/08 05:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi Fredk,

I usually tell consumers to ignore "Dynamic Power Output" ratings in watts, as it's a misleading spec intended to convince buyers that a stereo or AV receiver has enormous power reserves available for driving low impedances. "Dynamic Headroom," expressed in dB, is a useful spec but few manufacturers ever quote it.

Large amounts of real dynamic headroom, sometimes as much as 6 dB, which some NAD amplifiers often possessed, was based around a "loose" power supply that would switch in extra output devices or voltage rails for large momentary increases in power output. The continuous power output rating would typically be much less, often as little as 30 watts or 50 watts per channel.

A used stereo receiver or stereo integrated amplifier would likely be fine for driving the M80s, as older units often had enough heat sinking and output device cooling to handle 4-ohm loads without the problems associated with many current AV receivers driving lower impedances.

Regards,


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: Buying an older receiver
alan #203064 04/03/08 06:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
fredk Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Thanks for the reply Allen. The Crown website mentioned that peak power and continuous power are within one watt of each other so what you say makes a lot of sense.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (Cork), 1,306 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4