Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Here we go again.
#258902 05/01/09 03:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,301
HomeDad Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,301
Audyssey Labs wants us to use 10-channel surround, Audyssey
Perfect for those with incurable upgradeitis, more speakers, new receiver. Whats next.


A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Re: Here we go again.
HomeDad #258903 05/01/09 04:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
I always feel like a target when they draw a circle with all them speakers firing at the poor (now poorer) listener sitting at the center.


See Mojo's signature
Re: Here we go again.
EFalardeau #258906 05/01/09 04:04 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
Would you refuse the blindfold?

Re: Here we go again.
CV #258907 05/01/09 04:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
The blindfold would interfere with the higher frequencies. Duh! \:\)


See Mojo's signature
Re: Here we go again.
CV #258909 05/01/09 04:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
What do you want on your tombstone?

Re: Here we go again.
pmbuko #258912 05/01/09 04:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Pepperoni.

This aggression will not stand, man.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Here we go again.
HomeDad #258923 05/01/09 07:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: HomeDad
Audyssey Labs wants us to use 10-channel surround, Audyssey
Perfect for those with incurable upgradeitis, more speakers, new receiver. Whats next.


They base their improvement over 5.1. Addressing what their system would add incrementally. They dismiss surround backs as not that important. I think in my particular room with the back wall being 16' away from the list. pos., that the SB spkrs. mounted on my ceiling 7' behind, provides content that would not be perceptible if it needed to be reflected off my back wall. This, of course, just speaks to 7.1 in my particular room. But, being all about me, who cares about all the other yahoos! ;\)

I was wondering if I should consider springing for a new Denon 4310 with the two high front 9.1 speakers. Wondering if 'that' feature combined with the better (I am assuming) amp, power supply, DACs, (+GUI), etc. would be worth doing over my 1909. The possibility of amps going to 11.1 (DSX + 7.1 backs) makes me think that I keep the 1909 for a year or two (or more) for these possible new technologies to settle into the market. It's not like I am 'suffering' with the 1909! ;\)

Interesting they state the 'wides' are more important than the 'heights'. I wonder if marketing has colored this opinion a bit. Implying the new height channel offerings of some the 2009/2010 AVR models, it seems it could be a convenient preemptive one up over the 'front height' AVRs coming out soon. Maybe I am just too cynical. Maybe not. \:\)

Last edited by davekro; 05/01/09 07:14 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: Here we go again.
davekro #258924 05/01/09 07:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
Dave, I have a feeling that if you wait a year or two for the "latest" 11.1 AVR you will also hear rumours of the new Denon "10,000" to come out in 2015 which has 19.3 with in-floor surrounds!


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: Here we go again.
Adrian #258925 05/01/09 07:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
 Originally Posted By: Adrian
which has 19.3 with in-floor surrounds!


With exactly one soundtrack certified: "Tremors VII: The Re-Tremorizing".

I'll pass. \:\)


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Here we go again.
Adrian #258927 05/01/09 07:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
Oh, cool, then I'll wait for that. ;\)

My point was more that I put much less weight to the new front height speakers as one of several criterion to decide if I should spend my hard earned (not quite) discretionary income on. This was one of the unknown's that my mind had me sucking up the marketing promotion on (front ht. spkrs.) Now, my upgradeitis has been quelled for the time being.

Last edited by davekro; 05/01/09 07:42 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: Here we go again.
davekro #258933 05/01/09 07:55 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Dave, as long as you keep telling Axiom I did an audition for you, I encourage you to go for as many speakers as possible.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Here we go again.
Ken.C #258936 05/01/09 08:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: kcarlile
Dave, as long as you keep telling Axiom I did an audition for you, I encourage you to go for as many speakers as possible.

\:\)


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: Here we go again.
tomtuttle #258944 05/01/09 09:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 32
H
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
H
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 32
 Originally Posted By: tomtuttle
Pepperoni.

This aggression will not stand, man.


ha! Mental image. Great movie.


Denon 3808, M22s, M2s, VP100, Hsu sub
Re: Here we go again.
hietpas #258957 05/01/09 11:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
local
Offline
local
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
It seems like the more experiments are done with more than 7.1 speakers, like the new Dolby PL IIz, the more evidence there is that suggests they don't add much. the latest being the review from cnet of the Onkyo 607 which offers PLIIz. They couldn't hear the extra speakers at all until they got up near them.


Steve
Re: Here we go again.
thefwam #259022 05/02/09 02:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: thefwam
It seems like the more experiments are done with more than 7.1 speakers, like the new Dolby PL IIz, the more evidence there is that suggests they don't add much. the latest being the review from cnet of the Onkyo 607 which offers PLIIz. They couldn't hear the extra speakers at all until they got up near them.

linky... :o)


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: Here we go again.
davekro #259026 05/02/09 03:34 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
local
Offline
local
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
my apologies, that can be found here


Steve
Re: Here we go again.
thefwam #259192 05/04/09 02:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
Intersting read.
from Cnet.
"The bottom line is we didn't feel that Dolby Pro Logic IIz processing added much to the value of the TX-SR607, and we wouldn't recommend people going through the hassle of setting up their home theaters in that arrangement."


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: Here we go again.
davekro #259373 05/05/09 12:56 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 313
L
LRA Offline
devotee
Offline
devotee
L
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 313
I do have a 7.1 setup and think there is a difference. Being surrounded by speakers really improve the experience. A 5.1 setup is enough to satisfy almost anyone but 7.1 is better. The hardest thing to do is the speakers placement, if you mess that up, it's pointless to add more.

Re: Here we go again.
LRA #259398 05/05/09 05:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
I've been experimenting with movies in my 'probably destined to never be finished) HT room". Early experiments with 7.1 in my small room where the rears were only a foot or two behind me proved boring enough that I went back to 5.1 rather than have speaker stands back there in my walking pathways.

In the new room, I have dug out the rears again and they are 8 to 10 feet behind me. I am getting more of a rap around effect and can now definitely see benefits. Rear effects are much more distinctly rear and wrap around effects flow smoothly from the side, left to right in the rear and up towards the other side.

The benefits of 7.1 seem to be very room and dimensionally dependent in my new found opinion.


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Re: Here we go again.
Murph #259400 05/05/09 05:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I have always felt 6/7.1 is only beneficial with very wide rooms and/or very long rooms with the rears at least 3-4 ft behind the listener.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,841
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 629 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4