Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
#262430 06/03/09 11:03 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
P
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
P
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
85% home theatre and television, 15% music. I have a Velodyne 10" sub to go along with whatever I choose. I think the in/on wall is a cool thing and it would be nice to not have big floorstanders in the small room, but I don't want to sacrifice sound quality.

I guess my question is, are the M60's just total and complete overkill in a room this size? Either set would be with a W150/VP150 and a pair of QS8's.

Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Potatohead #262433 06/03/09 11:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
I'm sure you'd be happy with either set-up. I am using M80s in a room about 25% larger than yours, and don't feel it's overkill. I haven't heard either the 60s or the 22s, but judging from what others have said, the M22s(wth a sub) have a very similar sound to the M80s....the M60s, I'm sure, will provide a little more detail than the M22s. Unless you AB the speakers, you may not notice any difference, as all Axiom speakers are designed with the same goal of transparency and many use the same drivers as well.
Ooops, why did I think you were talking about the 22's? Doh!!

Last edited by Adrian; 06/03/09 11:18 PM.

Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Adrian #262437 06/03/09 11:45 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 90
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 90
I have the 22's in my bedroom it is a little over 2000 cubic feet, and they sound wonderful. Either way you go, you can't go wrong with Axiom speakers they are truely great speakers.


Gieseman
Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Gieseman #262440 06/04/09 01:12 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
I did an a/b comparison of the M22+ sub and the M60 and the sound almost the same. If you prefer the look of the W22 go with them.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Adrian #262442 06/04/09 01:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
 Quote:
the M60s, I'm sure, will provide a little more detail than the M22s

Not really. The 80s had a little more detail. The upper end seemed to open up on the M80s vs the M22 + sub, but not so with the m60.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
fredk #262461 06/04/09 04:18 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
P
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
P
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
So really, is the only advantage of the larger woofers in the M60 is to provide more bass? My sub will take care of that anyway. I just figured because they were three ways they would provide better coverage. I guess if that was the case Axiom could have made the M/W22 as a three way but they must not have felt a need.

Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Potatohead #262497 06/04/09 02:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi potatohead,

The advantage of a 3-way system is not so much "better coverage" as it is better power handling in big rooms, because there are more (and larger) drivers. They will play much louder and cleaner in really big rooms than will smaller compact speakers with fewer drivers. Mind you, the M22s are no slouches in terms of peak dynamics in moderate-size rooms, especially when you couple them with a good subwoofer.

One other virtue of using compact speakers like the M22s with a sub in smaller rooms is that you have more placement options and versatility than you do with a big floorstanding speaker. You can locate the compact mains for ideal soundstage and imaging without having to worry about boundary effects from the low bass (because the M22s, M2s and M3s don't have the deep bass output of a floorstander, they aren't affected nearly as much by nearby walls, floors and surfaces).

Regards,

Alan


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
alan #262519 06/04/09 04:44 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
P
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
P
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
Thanks for the great response Alan.

I think I will stick with the W22's.

Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Potatohead #262788 06/07/09 02:36 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
P
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
P
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
OK guys, here is the dilemma I am facing with this. I'm sure if I was in my darn house now I would just order something and be done with it, but the house won't be done for a couple months so I am killing myself thinking of all the possibilities before I move. I saw an older thread with someone posting pictures of a HG cherry M60, and it's freaking gorgeous.

I am still looking at two options. After actually looking at the blueprints of the room, and accounting for the soffit in it, it's actually more like 1600 square feet. I thought I was set on the 22's but I know if I buy the 60's I have something I won't grow out of and can use for a decade or more.

1. W22/W150/QS8's. I would love to do a real wood finish, but I don't know if it's worth it with the small amount of wood on the W series speakers. HG cherry vinyl is a very real option for this setup.

2. M60/VP150/QS8's. I would really want to do this in the HG cherry after seeing the picture earlier. This option is about 15% more than the real wood W22 setup, but in reality it would work out about the same because I wouldn't have to build a sub wall around the screen to mount the W speakers like I was planning.

So, I'll start a poll.

1. Real wood is pointless with W series, go with HG cherry W22's, they're plenty big with your sub.
2. Real wood adds class and exclusivity, do the real wood W22's, they're plenty big for the room with your sub.
3. Bigger is always better, and function is better than form (insert man grunt here), go with a factory outlet M60 setup
4. Get the best of both worlds, don't be so cheap and do the 60's in the HG cherry.


Thanks guys

Re: W22 vs M60... 1700 cubic feet
Potatohead #262790 06/07/09 02:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
Well if budget allows I would go 4 then I would go 3 but 1 and 2 would be fine as well. It is all just a matter how much you are willing to spend. You could also choose 5 which is the M80's/vp150/QS8 from the factory outlet which would be similar in price to 4. Confused yet? ;\)




I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.

-Max Payne
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,841
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (umbrau44), 800 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4