|
Take 5 vs. M22/VP100/QS4
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 46
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 46 |
What am I going to gain if I were to switch to an M22/VP100/QS4 set up. People talk of imaging, which is great. But I am 90% or more home theatre. Most likely my Energy Take 5 system (Mirage MS-12) has shoved me into just using my system for HT and not much 2ch stereo.
The best part...I am a day away from signing papers on a new house, which has a 11x20x7.5 room in the basement. It is earmarked for HT.
Anyway...what would I gain by going with Axiom and what (if anything) would I lose. I run an HK 520.
|
|
|
Re: Take 5 vs. M22/VP100/QS4
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3 |
Hi Curtis,
I have the Energy Take 5 system that I use for home theater. In the same room I have my stereo setup which have the M80's. Just for stereo sound their is no comparison. The effiency and soundstage are incredible in the M80's. Granted I'm comparing M80's to the Take 5 system . Maybe if you get the Axiom's you may find yourself listening to music more often.
|
|
|
Re: Take 5 vs. M22/VP100/QS4
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 46
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 46 |
I just received my M22/VP150/QS8 setup. I opted for the big center and big surrounds. Now to get them hooked up.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,228
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|