5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5 |
I am torn between going for a 5.1 or just go for the 7.1.
Mostly music and movies usage with the occasional PS-3 shoot 'em ups for some socially acceptable stress relief. Room is 14 x 16 and I don't do loud volume.
I plan to use M22's as the fronts, a VP150 center and QS8's for the two surrounds. I have an existing active Velodyne 12" sub that provides more than enough thump for my tastes.
My goal is balance as opposed to raw volume capability.
My question is if I go the 7.1 route should I pair the 8's with QS4's for the rear duty.
Or should I do four QS-4's?
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
The question is how much room do you have behind the listening position to make use of the rear channels? Generally you need about 4' or more to really utilize the rear channels, if it is less then you could think about a rear channel QS8 otherwise the M2s are a popular choice.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
The answer to your question lies in your room size, and where you are sitting in relationship to the back wall. From the dimensions you listed, 7.1 might be difficult.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
I would keep the sides and rears the same. In that size of room I'm not sure how much benefit the rears will be though. My room is the same width and about 3 ft longer and I'm utilizing a 5.1 setup. If I had closer to 2500+ cu ft, I'd consider rears but really they need to be placed 3-4 ft behind your seating position to work best.
Why not go 5.1, try it out first, then if you feel you still want to try a 7.1 system, go ahead and order a couple more "Q's" afterwards?
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5 |
Wow - thanks for the prompt replies! I think I underestimated - the room is slightly larger - 16 wide by 19 long (screen is at one side of the length). There is about 3 - 4 feet in back of the couch. It may be sage advice to go with the 5.1 first and rough in the wires for the extra rears while I'm in the crawlspace. if it is less then you could think about a rear channel QS8 otherwise the M2s are a popular choice. Can you clarify? You mean a single QS8, or a pair of M2's, even if there is less than 4 feet?
Last edited by nanook; 12/28/09 10:00 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5 |
ps any tricks for fishing cable down an insultated (fiberglass)wall?
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349 |
To echo what's already been said, the 5.1 vs 7.1 argument really boils down to the room size & dimensions. In oddly shaped, large, or rooms with weird acoustics, you can see a benefit in those extra rear channels from increased rear fill-in. But 14x16 is a pretty small room, as far as HT goes. That's not a problem - of course - I just don't think you really will need the extra fill-in that you get from the 6+7 speakers. Just calibrate & balance the 5.1 well, and you'll get that all-enveloping, smooth-transitioning sound that you're after. My den is about 18x30. I've tinkered with setting up rear 6+7.1 channels in the past. It didn't do much for me. There just wasn't enough of a difference to really make me say, "oh wow!". I run 5.1 with the QS8's and am thrilled with the setup. The dimensionality and transparency of the QS speakers are simply stunning. Audio effects move seamlessly behind us and have an absurd amount of spaciousness and depth. So much so, it's sometimes creepy. We've heard people running around in the room upstairs, above the den. We've heard people talking in the yard behind the den. Fellow NFL fans screaming obscenities from the bathroom adjoining the den. Whispers from the other end of the couch. Cannons firing from all around the room. All thanks to those QS8's. Or the house is haunted. My advice would be to start with a pair of QS8's now and see how that works for you. You can always add more channels later. And actually, I *think* that I remember reading somewhere that the 6+7 channels in a 6/7.1 setup are supposed to be normal mono-directional speakers (M22's, M2's, M3's, etc) and not the omni-directional kind like the QS's. But maybe I'm mis-remembering that. Might want to check into that before (if/when) you ever do go 7.1 Good luck! And welcome to the Axiom owner nut-house.
M80v2 | VP150v2 | QS8v2 SVS Pci+ 20-39 Emotiva UMC-1 & LPA-1 M22ti + T-Amp, in the Office
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
My room is a little bigger than yours with a bit more room behind the couch. AND going from 5.1 to 7.1 was really a pretty subtle change for me. I like QS8's for the back, too. If your experience is like mine, the 5.1 setup with QS8's will be pretty darn satisfying.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Tom, you have to calibrate your speakers correctly. lol.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 66
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 66 |
It is fair to point out there is a very, very small percentage of material that will actually give you distinct sound to 7 channels and of those titles on blu ray I've listened to the difference has been so subtle I wouldn’t' go to great lengths to do 7.1 for myself and I have a very similar room size to you. In larger rooms as already mentioned it can serve a purpose to help fill the sound out in the room, but for the point of hearing 7 distinct channels I don't think the source material has a high enough penetration right now to bother. As far as fishing the wire, is your ceiling finished? Dry walled? Drop ceiling? Do you have access to it from an attic maybe? If you can get access it isn't to bad to fish down insulated walls if there is some sort of vapour barrier or something between the wall and insulation... if there isn't then it can get a little tricky... here's hoping you don't have any horizontal bracing on your walls or you're in big trouble I actually pulled my baseboards off and fished from my baseboards up for my surrounds and ran my wires behind my baseboard. Or rather I fished from the hole I made, down to the baseboards.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
Can you clarify? You mean a single QS8, or a pair of M2's, even if there is less than 4 feet?
If less than 4ft QS8's either a pair or a single, I ran a 6.1 system for years and it worked very well as the QS spreads the sound out very well, but with the new 7.1 movies an extra rear channel might be warranted. If the distance is more than 4ft then I would recommend some M2s or M22s as the distance will allow the speaker to spread the sound out and also throw the sound out towards the listening position. Although alot of this is personal prefference, some people still prefer the QS all the way around.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
It is fair to point out there is a very, very small percentage of material that will actually give you distinct sound to 7 channels and of those titles on blu ray I've listened to the difference has been so subtle I wouldn’t' go to great lengths to do 7.1 for myself and I have a very similar room size to you. In larger rooms as already mentioned it can serve a purpose to help fill the sound out in the room, but for the point of hearing 7 distinct channels I don't think the source material has a high enough penetration right now to bother. But to say it another way. There is some 7.1 discrete content out there now, and there will only be more in the future. Along with PLIIx which can make 7.1 out of anything (not to mention PLIIz which can make 9.1 out of anything). Don't rule out support for 7.1 if you have even the smallest interest in using it in the future. At least run the wires, or make some allotment for it, even if you stick with 5.1 for now.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
'Nook, welcome. As some of the replies indicated, the determining factor isn't the size of the room, but the availability of enough space behind the listening position for a good rear sound field to develop. There's no hard and fast rule, but at least 4' is a common suggestion. If not, a 7.1 setup wouldn't likely be of significant benefit(and a single rear surround in 6.1 wouldn't be either), and mounting the side surrounds a couple feet farther back than directly to the side would give a bit of phantom back effect to help out some. You could consider moving the couch slightly toward the front to provide more space behind you.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
My room is a little bigger than yours with a bit more room behind the couch. Junk in the trunk?
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 602
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 602 |
Why not start with 5.1 and see if that's good enough? Or if you have a newer receiver, adding WIDE or HEIGHT speakers adds more to the overall effect - so I'm told.
I believe I'll be going with the HEIGHT speakers soon. According the the people that invented it (Dolby PLIIz or Audyssey's DSX), the order of importance is WIDE followed by HEIGHT.
But in my room, WIDEs are out of the question.
-- Denon 4520, EPIC80/500/VP180 Speakers
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5 |
Thanks for all the great advice and suggestions so far - this looks to be a very active and helpful forum.
I recognize that 7.1 material is just starting to emerge in the marketplace.
I just bought a new receiver on Boxing Day so I should be good in that department for the next couple of years. Well, actually I bought two because I couldn't decide which one I really wanted. I got a Yammie 6290 and a Denon 890. We'll see which one earns their place in the equipement rack.
Although the room is not an odd shape I still don't have huge placement flexibilty because on one side wall at the midway point is a fireplace so furnture is either before or after it.
The wire fishing idea should work - both suurounds are on an exterior wall so there should be a vapour barrier. But I am considering the baseboard idea too.
The surrounds will go on side walls that are 6 feet long so I could go a foot or two in front, even or a foot or two in back as one of you mentioned.
Since the QS's seem to be somewhat "multidirectional" if I mount them behind the main listening area should I purchase a pivoting bracket so they can be angled or will a flat wall mount set-up be fine?
Thanks again for all the feedback.
Last edited by nanook; 12/29/09 03:28 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Yes, if you use only side surrounds they should be positioned a couple feet farther back rather than directly to the side. The "multidirectional" nature of the QSs makes it unnecessary to aim them and they should be mounted flat to the wall.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
But to say it another way. There is some 7.1 discrete content out there now, and there will only be more in the future. I really wonder about what they choose to release in 7.1. There are some crazily unimportant catalog titles that get 7.1 audio, yet there are so many new big blockbusters that stick with 5.1.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
I think it has to do a lot with whether the audio is being remixed for the release or not. One of the first DVDs with DTS ES 6.1 was Se7en. The picture and audio were completely reworked for DVD release, so they figured since the 6.1 tech was available they might as well use it. I figure the same is happening with BD. When the sound is being completely remixed they figure might as well go all the way. But for recent theatrical releases which already have strong 5.1 mixes, they just get ported straight to disc.
By the way, the new 7.1 mix on The Nightmare Before Christmas BD is amazing.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
Man, I fell asleep during my viewing of that Blu-ray, and I still haven't made a point of watching it in its entirety, but yes, that movie really pops on BD, both in picture and sound.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 601
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 601 |
Some people seem to think direct radiating speakers are best for the rears and push the M2's....but I never hear of anybody pushing the on-walls or in-walls. The M2's just seem to be too deep and perhaps overkill for the rears. It seems to me that the W2's or W3's would be up to the job while staying out of the way. What do you guys think?
Made on a Mac
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Based on the amount of audio information coming from the rear speakers I doubt I would be able to tell the difference between the Ms or the Ws in the back. My preference would still be for the Ms since they can be more easily re-tasked but if you knew 100% that you were going to leave them in the back and in/on-wall fits/looks better then I couldn’t give a good sound quality based reason not to use them.
Last edited by grunt; 12/29/09 09:57 AM.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 601
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 601 |
That was my thinking Grunt. I know the speakers I will use to replace my 401 Bose rears will stay in place so I'm not worried about the re-tasking issue. I think they will be my next Axiom purchase.
Last edited by vassillios; 12/29/09 04:11 PM.
Made on a Mac
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Man, I fell asleep during my viewing of that Blu-ray, and I still haven't made a point of watching it in its entirety, but yes, that movie really pops on BD, both in picture and sound. That is one movie I would not want to fall asleep during--yeek! Assuming you're talking about Se7en.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
Oh, I was referring to The Nightmare Before Christmas. Se7en is certainly disturbing, but I wouldn't mind it on Blu-ray. I don't know how many times I would actually watch it again, but it's a well-done movie.
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
Actually, I think we were talking about The Nightmare Before Christmas. Alas, Se7en is not available on BD yet.
The Game, Se7en, and Fight Club are all some of my top movies of all time. Only the last is on BD (and very much worth the purchase).
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: 5.1 to 7.1 - Surrounds Question
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Se7en and Ransom are two movies that I saw, thought I was glad that I had seen them, and decided that I never wanted to see them again.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,026
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|