Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,235
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,235 |
I have a Yamaha receiver. While I appreciate the sound and clarity, it has always bothered me that the Yamaha tone controls are mostly meaningless. Why did they even bother putting bass and treble knobs on these things? I'm leaning toward looking for a receiver with meaningful tone controls, if such a beast still exists?
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488 |
what do you mean.
They adjust it TOO much or not enough? For instance on my NAD the tone controls are set so that they only adjust the extremes. i dont care because i just bypass them anyway though.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958 |
I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345 |
Tone controls are historically scoffed at by "audiophiles". The reasoning is straightforward enough...adjusting tone introduces distortion away from what the musicians intended, blah blah blah.
Many receivers have perfectly functional tone controls, if that sort of thing is your cup of tea. Ask a knowledegable local dealer for which receiver has what you're looking for...just be prepared for some funny looks.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
In reply to:
The reasoning is straightforward enough...adjusting tone introduces distortion away from what the musicians intended, blah blah blah.
The same arguement can be used against tube amps...
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Bruce, the Yamaha tone controls are typical of those on receivers. Maybe you could clarify what you're specifically looking for.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,235
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,235 |
Before I had the Yammie I had a dolby pro logic Pioneer which possessed more pronounced tonal adjustment. Apparently, Pioneer is hanging on to this remnant of the past along with a loudness control, does anyone remember LC.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,235
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,235 |
NOT ENOUGH, I just feel that, as owners of hi-fi equipment we ought to be given the ability to set the bass and treble the way we want to hear it, not as some manufacturer decides it should be.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Begone, ye who desires to mess(eth) with authoritahhhh!
I agree, though, that people should be able to tweak the sound as they see fit.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488 |
sounds like you better get an EQ (gasp)
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625 |
my rxv1300 has a bass boost button it. i imagine it's the same as LC.
dan
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 185
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 185 |
What on earth was "loudness" control? Always struck me (even in high school, way back when) as just a way to turn the volume up.
Birdman
"These go to eleven."
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625 |
not so on my older panasonic stereo, it accented the bass and treble, and on the yammie, it does increase the bass level. it's only on when one of the kids accidently hits the button.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 97
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 97 |
If I understand it correctly, it's there to up the lower end bass and the upper end treble so that it sounds better when listening at lower volumes. It's called loudness or bass boost or contour, sometimes (from what I've seen).
This vintage HK amp I have has a cool feature by which the effect is lessened as you turn the thing up, until it is completely defeated. It actually does make the output sound consistent all the way through the dial... for example, the bass is still present at low volumes versus almost nonexistent with the contour control off.
I've hated the control on every other amp I've had, though.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Hmpf. I apparently have tin ears, because that's the first button I turn on on a vintage receiver (or on the car stereo). Otherwise, they've just sounded anemic to me. However, since I haven't found such a thing on my H/K, I don't. I haven't touched tone controls, however, since I got semi-decent speakers.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
The loudness button does the same thing as replacing your speakers with Bose. It emphasises bass and treble.
If you could see the EQ curve, I do believe it would look like a saddle.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Nowave is essentially correct. The "Loudness" control, offered in the past on Yamaha preamps and receivers and some H/K units was an extra control, which, if it was reasonably well designed (the "contour" of the control), was intended to compensate for our ear's decreasing sensitivity to low bass at quiet listening levels. You first set the volume to a normal fairly loud level. Then you'd turn down the separate Loudness control to whatever low level you preferred. As you rotated the control, it applied gradually increasing levels of bass boost which approximated the loss of bass sensitivity of our ears at low volume.
Most consumers never really understood the purpose of the control, so they gradually disappeared from consumer gear. And some applied increasing bass and treble boost (the treble boost wasn't needed). Other receivers had a cruder "Loudness" button, which when activated, applied a fixed level of bass boost--typically at least 10 dB in the low frequencies and 3 to 5 dB in the highs.
Consumers who bought small, crummy bookshelf systems in the '70s and '80s would invariably run their systems with the Loudness button always activated because it boosted the fairly non-existent bass and poor treble of cheap speakers so they sounded "better" to their ears. With good speakers, the effect was grotesque. When partying, turning up the volume with the Loudness button activated would invariably drive the low-powered receivers into clippiing and burn out woofers or tweeters. For example, making bass subjectively "twice as loud" (an increase of 10 dB) requires ten times as much power, so it was no surprise when inexpensive low-powered receivers blew out speakers driven with the Loudness button activated.
Our ears' insensitivity to deep bass at low volume have been measured and graphed by acousticians and researchers (the first were Fletcher and Munson; later research refined those curves). I suspect you could track them down with a Google search.
Regards,
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 20
hobbyist
|
hobbyist
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 20 |
I know this post is almost a month old, but I thought I'd add my 2 cents. I have a Yamaha receiver as well, and was confused that the bass / treble / balance knobs didn't seem to have any effect on the sound. I found out that switching on "Pure Direct" bypasses all tone controls, sending the signal unchanged (but amplified) to the speakers.
I think most Yamaha folks know this, but it was news to me (I had to figure it out the hard way).
|
|
|
Re: Receiver tone control
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hey, ubernatural, I think you hit on the reason that he thought the controls didn't do anything! He likely had the "Pure Direct" mode engaged.
However, it is true that modern tone controls have far less boost and cut available than the old tone controls found on '60s and '70s gear. Back then, most controls had as much as 15 dB boost and cut. Now, it's rare to see any that offer more than about 8 dB boost/cut.
Regards,
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
733
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|