VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
newbie
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1 |
Hello fellow Axiom Enthusiasts, I am currently running M80 fronts, vp150 center, and Qs8 surrounds. I absolutely LOVE everything other than the 150. I even use M22 bookshelves in my bedroom and think they are top notch! The 150 sounded really nice in my condo but recently I bought a house and my living room is much larger now. For some reason the 150 seems to be stuggling to keep up with the mains and also sounds a bit hollow. I did experiment with turning up the volume to the center alone and that helped a tad. I am thinking about upgrading the VP180 but I am hesitant to pull the trigger without hearing it or at least hearing what people think about it first as the return shipping on this beast from California would be substantial. I have heard a lot of grumbling about the layout of the tweeters on this speaker. People who have yet to listen to a 180 seem to be instantly turned off to it because of the distance from one tweeter to the next. I would absolutely love to hear from Axiom owners who have the speaker, especially if you upgraded from a 150. Better yet, I know this is a long shot but if anyone in the San Diego, CA area has one of these and wouldn't mind demoing it I would be greatly obliged. Thanks to all in advance!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Hey Dave, I know if you use the search function there are threads from some of the other owners. Just search for VP180 in the subject line. I know SRoode did a very nice review and he has a kick a$$ setup. I just got mine, but am in the middle of remodeling the HT so haven't had a lot of listening time with it. Right now all my other speakers are packed away and the VP180 is vertical cranking up some tunes while I apply my mud coats to the drywall. Sounds killer.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
I was wondering how 3 vertical VP180s would work behind an acoustically transparent (AT) screen. Would it sound better, worse, or the same as 3 vertical M80s?
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Dave, welcome. I can't do VP180 impressions, but I do have a suggestion for a "new" center speaker that you can try for free to see if it makes a difference. Take one of your M22s and set it up as a vertical center(even in front of the screen for a temporary experiment)to get some idea of what a change might do.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422 |
I have a VP150 and have had similar questions in the past. I was hoping to hear things like "just get a second VP150 or add a VP100", but instead, I hear that the VP180 is significantly superior to even dual VP150 setups. That is frustrating since I don't like the idea of having to auction off my VP150 to get a VP180. I just fear that I won't get enough out of it to be an "easy" financial upgrade. It is definitely on my list of things to look closer at though. I hear that going from a VP150 to a VP180 is a bigger upgrade than going from M60 fronts to M80 fronts.
I will probably get another set of QS8's first though, but like I said, it will always be on my list...
Farewell - June 4, 2020
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
I was wondering how 3 vertical VP180s would work behind an acoustically transparent (AT) screen. Would it sound better, worse, or the same as 3 vertical M80s? Probably worse since it was designed differently for better horizontal dispersion when oriented horizontally . Though I suspect a vertical VP180 would sound better than a horizontal M80.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769 |
Here is a link to what I wrote when I got it. I'll also find other owner's comments. http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/ubbthre...0941#Post310941
Bruno M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890 ------------------------------------ "The problem is choice..."
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
Probably worse since it was designed differently for better horizontal dispersion when oriented horizontally . Though I suspect a vertical VP180 would sound better than a horizontal M80. I'd still like to see someone try using VP180s vertically as mains. Maybe if I ever get duals for centers. Hey, maybe JC can try. While it's true that it was designed to be a horizontal center, I still wonder if the driver arrangement could sound decent vertically, since, Dean, don't you prefer your M80 tweeters elevated above ear level? If you made the mids of the VP180 at ear level, the tweeters would be above and below your ears instead of at ear level. You'd need a stand, which would be odd for such a big speaker, but I just wonder if the current M80 design (and that of a lot of other loudspeakers) is a compromise since most companies don't want to ship speakers that go from your floor to your ceiling, so it's just easier to make a speaker with tweeters at the top of the enclosure.
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Axiom did test it with different layouts before settling on the unconventional layout they're using. Just because it looks different doesn't mean it's wrong... and I've heard nothing but praise from owners around here.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 110
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 110 |
Best way IMHO for you to get an idea of what the VP180 sounds like:
1. Listen to the VP180 in your room. 2. Listen to a phantom centre from two M80's in your room. 3. Listen to the VP180 in some else's room. 4. Listen to a single M80.
These will give you a good idea of the VP180's capabilities IMHO; if you like the sound of M80's then you'll like the sound of the VP180. FWIW I actually found the phantom centre to sound quite close to the VP180, but the VP180 was even more defined and sounded way better off axis.
M80s, VP180, QS8s, EP800 v3
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901 |
Yes, I hooked up 80's the 772 again because my Onkyo amp will be another week at least. Man, they sound good after not listening for awhile.
I am seriously thinking another VP150, just because I have one and probably fit it in easily compared to VP180.
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 110
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 110 |
I was wondering how 3 vertical VP180s would work behind an acoustically transparent (AT) screen. Would it sound better, worse, or the same as 3 vertical M80s? Probably worse since it was designed differently for better horizontal dispersion when oriented horizontally . Though I suspect a vertical VP180 would sound better than a horizontal M80. The horizontal dispersion of the VP180 is quite good. I find that I need to exceed 30 degrees off centre before losing 2-3dB. I don't actually have any seating that far off, was just testing / measuring for curiosity sake.
M80s, VP180, QS8s, EP800 v3
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Yes, if you leave it horizontal, that is the purpose of the design. Flipping it vertical would not be good for l/c/r as catbrat was asking.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357 |
I was wondering how 3 vertical VP180s would work behind an acoustically transparent (AT) screen. Would it sound better, worse, or the same as 3 vertical M80s? Probably worse since it was designed differently for better horizontal dispersion when oriented horizontally . Though I suspect a vertical VP180 would sound better than a horizontal M80. What about if you set it on a 45 degree angle to split the difference? Eh, eh .
The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
I'm not so sure that using the VP180 vertically is such a bad idea. I've heard Alan say that the VP150 in a vertical position sounds good. If that's the case, then perhaps almost any center channel speaker would sound good in a vertical position (excpeting those where they crowd all the speakers together).
It looks like it's only using a vertical speaker horizontally sounds bad.
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
I haven't heard anything negative about the 180 from owners. In fact, it's all been "glowing" and makes me want one.
To the OP, I'd definitely try one!
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
I'm sure it will sound ok, but the drivers are designed to have a horizontal dispersion when in a horizontal orientation, if you flip the speaker in no longer has the same qualities. Would be no different than laying a regular M80 on its side, you wouldn't normally do this.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
... but the drivers are designed to have a horizontal dispersion when in a horizontal orientation... Aren't the drivers the same in all of the different speaker cabinets?
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Same drivers, and I am not a speaker designer, however, it is my understanding that the sound disperses horizontally, so if you flip the speaker it will be dispersing horizontally, not what you want and goes against he design purpose.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
It's actually the crossover design that compensates for the front baffle being wider in the VP180; selecting a slightly different frequency response curve.
A speaker designed for horizontal placement will not be as linear when placed vertically. It'll still sound good, but some frequencies may be accented or attenuated more than it's vertical companion (which also has a curve manipulated for it's designated placement).
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
No one is saying that a vertically arrayed VP180 won’t sound good. You asked if it would sound better than an M80 which is very unlikely. I have not heard that comparison but can say that no speaker manufacture I know of puts a tweeter at the top and bottom of a vertical cabinet. Not even Axioms M80 which has both tweeters at the top. There’s a reason for this. However, that doesn’t mean that a vertically arrayed VP180 won’t sound good. It might even sound better than a horizontally arrayed VP180 assuming you are basing sound quality on average frequency variation as one moves off axis. Audioholics did a test of various horizontal speakers with redundant drivers and found that in all cases arraying them vertically gave a better off axis frequency response. Some designs more than others. One thing to note is that a $115 vertical bookshelf speaker beat every horizontally arrayed horizontal center they tested. Only one horizontal center arrayed horizontally costing $2,500 equaled off axis performance of the $115 bookshelf speaker. http://www.audioholics.com/education/loudspeaker-basics/vertical-vs-horizontal-speaker-designsMy own ears told me this when I first got my VP150 which is why I switched to an M80 center. Since then I’ve tested M22 and M2 speakers as centers and found they both beat the crap out of the VP150 arrayed either vertically or horizontally. That doesn’t mean a horizontal array of drivers can’t sound good. Even me the vertical center nazi of the forum admit that there are time during movies and video games where a horizontal array of speakers creates a “wall-of-sound” that can give a more “movie-theater-like” performance that sounds quite impressive. I’ve even considered getting a VP180 and mounting it on a swivel so I can change it’s orientation between vertical and horizontal to have the best of both worlds but I’m just to lazy to try it since my M80 center already sounds so good.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
Ok. Thanks guys. That definitely has swayed me towards 3 M80's for behind the screen speakers as opposed to the VP180s. Although I might have to mount them up-side down, which I won't know until I try them. But, that's still quite a ways down the road.
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Ok. Thanks guys. That definitely has swayed me towards 3 M80's for behind the screen speakers as opposed to the VP180s. Although I might have to mount them up-side down, which I won't know until I try them. But, that's still quite a ways down the road. You will have no problem mounting them upside down as long as you can keep the tweeters or midrange drivers near ear level. I had my M80 center mounted upside down on top of my HDTV in my apartment while the L/R were sitting right side up on the sides of it and it was the best sounding front soundstage I’ve ever heard.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443 |
Of course if you turn the 180 vertical you can either sit and watch or lay on the floor and watch and get similar tweeter response
"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
My own ears told me this when I first got my VP150 which is why I switched to an M80 center. Since then I’ve tested M22 and M2 speakers as centers and found they both beat the crap out of the VP150 arrayed either vertically or horizontally.
::puffs out chest and looks lovingly at hist dual M2 centers::
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901 |
Nice, now you have me F*&^%# right up!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
seems people round here like to insult the messenger rather than examine the real issue. The Axiom amp is a danger. The Audioholics review sugar coated that fact. Owners of the amp spoke out at AVS and now people here still defend Axiom on this. I'm done with this forum, at least AVS entertains discussions from all viewpoints....pffpht..
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Nice, now you have me F*&^%# right up! Its always about trade offs, your personal setup and what other influences there are (like an SO with different priorities). Pick the solution that fits the best in your situation and be happy. None of the centers that Axiom offers are bad.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901 |
I was just messing with ya, I am happy....for now!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
I was just messing with ya, I am happy....for now! Nice, now you have me F*&^%# right up!
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: VP180 impressions
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901 |
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
681
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|