Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: axiom paradigm
fredk #343770 04/01/11 01:41 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I think the M3 "different from Axiom" bit is a tad overdone... especially by people who haven't heard the M3s. Don't stress on it. In our M80/M50/M3 comparison (yes yes the M50 test was flawed, everyone, UNTIL WE FIXED IT), the M3s were actually more similar to the M80s than the M50s were or than they were to the M50s. The M3s and M50s are supposed to be similar.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: axiom paradigm
Ken.C #343799 04/01/11 01:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
Enjoy the M3's, they are wonderful bookshelfs. I heard the M3s for the first(only) time when I took part in the M3 vs B&W test.


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: axiom paradigm
Adrian #343822 04/01/11 02:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
Then it was off to Ian's dock for double stacked M80s hanging from chains off his boat sheds rafters..... The live band sounded every bit as good or better as any commercial system at that short range.

Add in the barbecued dinosaur. Epic!!


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Re: axiom paradigm
Ken.C #343855 04/01/11 06:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Originally Posted By: Ken.C
I think the M3 "different from Axiom" bit is a tad overdone... especially by people who haven't heard the M3s. Don't stress on it. In our M80/M50/M3 comparison (yes yes the M50 test was flawed, everyone, UNTIL WE FIXED IT), the M3s were actually more similar to the M80s than the M50s were or than they were to the M50s. The M3s and M50s are supposed to be similar.
In this instance it is not overdone, the OP is looking to the M3 to be a representative of the M80 sound, as he states he might buy M80s if he likes the M3's. I wouldn't want him to buy the M80s and then realize they are not as laid back as the M3. That recessed midrange playback the M3 has does not happen on the M80. This is not to say the M3 is a not a good speaker but it isn't as close in tonal SQ to the M80 as the M22 or M2.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,480
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 992 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4