Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210 |
I have several dozen rolls of undeveloped 35mm film that was taken during the late 70s to early 80s, they have been stored in the house and in a zippered camera bag stuffed into a dark cabinet.
Do you all believe this film will be good after all of these years? I was thinking about trying a single roll first but thought I gather your thoughts first.
TYVM
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
I would try one roll first, but add what you just said to the special instructions and send it to Kodac (probably, if they still do this type of thing) and not Walmart for development.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
as long as they were never in direct sunlight or in hot weather, they should be ok. just to be sure, have one developed and see.
it's best always to keep unopened film boxes in the fridge, and when a film has been exposed and can't be developed right away, it should be put in it's little airtight plastic box when the air humidity index is about 30%, and not more, and freeze it until the day you have them developed.
film development has been standardized for ages, and all the development machines are completely automatic, so there's very little to worry about this. Telling the lab they're very old negs will not change a thing. where there is lots of variations is in the printing of those negs. some labs do very good work and others stink.
my credentials in photography: photolab technician for about 20 years. now retired.
Last edited by J. B.; 01/08/12 08:46 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
even if the films have been exposed to heat, like very hot weather, the negs should still give you photos that are worth printing; the colors might be a bit different and the contrast too, but overall it should not be bad.
if you have one roll developed and the prints don't look very bad, then you could have only the films developed, and not printed; then you could use a good scanner to digitize the films and then process those negs in a good image program like photoshop to bring them up to a very good quality level. once this is done, you can see the photos on your monitor or print them.
Last edited by J. B.; 01/08/12 08:54 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210 |
That's good and interesting info, thanks J.B. I'll let y'all know how and if they come out.
Unless the evidence is too incriminating.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 859
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 859 |
Unless the evidence is too incriminating. Be careful there Rick. Never know what you were taking pics of back in the 70's!
M80's(2), VP150, QS8's(2), M3's(4)
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236 |
Kodak does not do this type of thing anymore and Wal Mart is fine if you send the film out in the envelopes. The envelopes go to Fuji for developing. Don't even try to ask the WalMart employee anything. You will get nothing more than a vacant stare.
Remember what JB said about the scanner.... don't fret too much if the prints are not great. The negatives still could be pretty darn good. Sometimes the automated machine is the culprit.
M3 and M80
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
even if the negatives are not very good as you might see on a few prints, those defects should be easily corrected with an image program. unless you're trained, it's very difficult to see if negatives have suffered from heat or are in good condition. if you do this, get a scanner that has at least 4800 dpi resolution. anything less and you will miss lots of fine details in the original negs.
Last edited by J. B.; 01/09/12 12:48 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Huh. I'd have thought Mark would want to be helpful here. Apparently not.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236 |
Cliff notes: they won't be perfect but there may be some images. Or maybe, there won't.
M3 and M80
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Hey Rick- Sorry, I haven't been around much. But I agree with everyone else!
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210 |
Thanks Mark, I'm rather stoked!
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
Rick, you may want to take the negatives to a photography shop. Not a CVS or something of the sort. Hopefully, a photography shop will understand the sensitivity of the negatives that you are trying to get developed and handle them with more care...
Good luck man.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
color film development is always done in automated machines; it does not know "Handling with care". it also has no provisions for special requests of any kind. someone takes the film out of the can, clips it to a running metal bar in the machine's "input" side, and it is automatically taken through all the steps necessary right up to drying. during all that time, no one and nothing ever touches the film, except the chemicals in the different baths. the employee who handles the undeveloped film usually wears white cotton gloves, just in case he would touch the emulsion side of the film.
if you have doubt about the film handling by an employee, then take it to a photography shop, as dakkon said; but even that is no guarantee; accidents can happen.
i've seen hundreds of thousands of film rolls processed and only 1 or maybe 2 films were ever ruined by the machine, not by an employee.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210 |
I took in a couple of rolls yesterday to CVS, one came out great while the other didn't develope at all. The guy said it appeared the roll that didn't develope was never shot but the negatives to me look like there may be some very faint images on them. The roll that did develope was from late '88 or very early '89 and as I stated, came out excellent. So far we're shooting 50% with only 50 more rolls to go.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
that's very good news. don't hesitate to ask me if you have any questions.
what's CVS ?
Last edited by J. B.; 01/10/12 07:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
CVS is a drug store chain.
Rick, how did you end up with so many undeveloped rolls?
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210 |
I really don't know Mark, it started while I was in the Army and was taking more pictures than there were facilities available in the remote area overseas I was stationed and it sort of snowballed from there.
|
|
|
Re: Question for you photo pros....
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
Does that mean there's a snowball's chance in Florida that the film is going to be okay?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,400
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|