Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 540
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 540 |
good catch, hmmm........i wonder?
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him?
|
|
|
Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,760 Likes: 40
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,760 Likes: 40 |
I have 2 stereo systems (2.1, 2 speakers and a sub) and 2 HT systems, a 5.2 and a 7.2. I actually prefer the 2 channel systems for listening to music.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 226
local
|
local
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 226 |
"I have 2 stereo systems (2.1, 2 speakers and a sub) and 2 HT systems, a 5.2 and a 7.2. I actually prefer the 2 channel systems for listening to music."
Clearly your ears are flawed. We will be forced to disregard all furthers comments/opinions. :-)
|
|
|
Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
In my current system I prefer listening to music in 2-channel as well. Of course, my opinion might change after I replace my Cambridge Soundworks surrounds with QS4s.
Preference has a lot to do with experience. I've spent most of my life listening to music from 2 speakers, so I expect music to sound a certain way. I have a few surround SACDs, and some do a better job of being transparent in the use of the surrounds than others. The ones that sound best to me (besides DSoTM, of course!) are the ones that use the surrounds sparingly, and solely for ambiance or helping define the space of the recording location.
|
|
|
Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
I prefer my music in 2.1, although 4.1 via DTS:Neo 6 is growing on me. I did listen in 2.0 for a little while, but getting that ol' sub back in the mix was a really nice thing.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
I meant 2.1, as well. My M22s really need the assistance of the sub. And my old Onkyo doesn't do any of those fancy-schmancy surround modes.
|
|
|
Re: "Stereo's Intrinsic Flaw"
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056 |
I mostly listen in 7 channel surround mode, but when I sit in front of my M60s, I usually change the receiver to "Pure direct" and only listen to the mains, no sub. I find that the bass is tighter and the imaging is better that way. I find that when listening in 2.1, the image collapses a bit... I don't know why. But, then again, I rarely get involved in critical listening sessions.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
595
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|