CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21 |
Thought this community might be interested in this article. http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/33549
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,500 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,500 Likes: 117 |
Excellent little video and thanks for posting.
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
This is something we've discussed before (not that we shouldn't discuss it again!). Rush is a particularly egregious example, unfortunately. I have heard that the latest album is much, much better.
Sting-Sacred Love is probably the loudest I have in my collection. Really annoying.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Yeah Jonah, some of those comments might not be precise in describing the problem, but a similar pattern of making the dynamic range narrower and having the maximum level at or sometimes beyond the digital clipping limit has been going on for years. This is primarily a problem with many pop discs and doesn't affect the classical CDs that I listen to. The CD format itself is fine, of course, and provides for a frequency response(22,050Hz)beyond human needs and a theoretical dynamic range(6.02n+1.76dB or 98dB)beyond practical home requirements(almost nothing is available with more than about a 60dB range); the problem is the drive to have the loudest disc, and almost uniformly so, for commercial purposes.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845 |
I think some CDs are already AT the bottom of the hill. I have posted about this subject, many times here.......I also remember several here disagreeing with me, when I tried to explain in my post, about the increased "loudness" of many of the re-mastered CDs. The example you posted, would seem to support my position. I wish I had more time to expound on this subject, I find it interesting.
Last edited by LT61; 07/11/07 03:31 AM.
LIFE: "Choices, balance, and timing"
(Larryism)
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,500 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,500 Likes: 117 |
We should start a petition. Who would we send it to?
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21 |
Quote:
We should start a petition. Who would we send it to?
Address it to "The Man" I think he lives in California somewhere. haha.
I have an example of a poorly recorded cd. It is poor because it was recorded too LOW and it sounds muddled. It is Collective Souls first album. Great music but sounds like crap.
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333 |
Interresting read. I had to go test this. I popped in the first CD I ever bought, Dire Straights Brothers in Arms, the very first DDD album in my collection and found a volume setting to achieve ~78 dB with peaks at 80/81 dB. Then I put in Dixie Chicks Wide Open Spaces CD and at the same volume setting I was now at 88 dB with peaks to 91/92 dB. Then I pu in my newest CD, the latest Rascal Flats offering and had to dive for the remote. It was now at 94 dB with peaks to 98 dB! Guess I should have shut the hall door, cause I woke up my oldest boy sleeping at the far end of the house (~100 feet away)!
Scott
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21 |
Quote:
Interresting read. I had to go test this. I popped in the first CD I ever bought, Dire Straights Brothers in Arms, the very first DDD album in my collection and found a volume setting to achieve ~78 dB with peaks at 80/81 dB. Then I put in Dixie Chicks Wide Open Spaces CD and at the same volume setting I was now at 88 dB with peaks to 91/92 dB. Then I pu in my newest CD, the latest Rascal Flats offering and had to dive for the remote. It was now at 94 dB with peaks to 98 dB! Guess I should have shut the hall door, cause I woke up my oldest boy sleeping at the far end of the house (~100 feet away)!
Scott
interesting.....did you notice the quality difference at those loud volumes?
|
|
|
Re: CD quality going downhill?
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333 |
The Dire Straits CD had the best clarity of the three, but all sound pretty good on the Axioms, in fact I've had the Chick's album cranked to 125+ dB without any noticeable distortion [over lower volume settings]. All three are original releases and I don't have any with a matching re-mastered version for a direct comparison which would really be helpful for this experiment. As it is it's comparing apples and oranges, but the test that newer albums are louder than older was proven. Dire Straits was produced in 1985, Chicks's was in 1998 and Flats in 2006. I've thought about getting the SACD version of the Brothers in Arms album 'cause I don't have any SACD's yet.
Scott
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
595
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|