Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Blind Listening Tests

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Wall'O'Fame
Experimental Atmos
Greetings fellow Axiom owners...
Who's Online
6 registered (fredk, Ken.C, Ian, Jungle, michael_d, Socketman), 42 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13330 Members
11 Forums
22922 Topics
405238 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17791
pmbuko 16289
SirQuack 13341
CV 11237
MarkSJohnson 10942
Meanwhile On Facebook

☺ Wow - our 13,000 likes! Awesome! #thankful

Did you get your "Golden Email"? The great gift certificate email giveaway star...

Here's a helpful article for everyone looking at putting a new stereo or home th...

Interesting article about who's getting the money from streaming radio services...

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#143324 - 07/11/06 07:49 PM M3's or M22's for Surrounds
TrapVector Offline
newbie

Registered: 05/11/06
Posts: 4
I bought 2xM-60's, 1xVP-150, 2xQS-8's, & an EP-350 a few months ago. Wouldn't ever go back to what I had. Never even considered returning them either. I'm thinking about getting the same setup for my father, but the room they would be placed in isn't suitable for the quadpolar QS8's. So with the above mentioned setup, I'm looking for advice on whether to get M3's or M22's to serve as the surrounds. I appreciate any feedback.

Top
#143325 - 07/11/06 09:08 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: TrapVector]
Jc Offline
aficionado

Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 501
Loc: Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Hi TrapVector,

I would be very curious to see a sketch of your parents’ room. Axiom has tested a multitude of different room configurations and there was not a single one where a direct or di-pole speaker was superior to an Axiom QS “Quadpolar” speaker.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jc
Axiom Audio Expert
jc@axiomaudio.com

Top
#143326 - 07/11/06 09:31 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: TrapVector]
HomeDad Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 12/29/05
Posts: 3301
Loc: Central,California
I'm guessing for your fathers room it is more of a placement issue rather than not wanting the QS8's, I think you would be fine with either choice as a surround, I'm sure someone will jump in and comment on which of the two would match best with the M60's sound wise.
_________________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Top
#143327 - 07/12/06 01:52 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: TrapVector]
INANE Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 02/04/04
Posts: 1669
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
M2's as surround perhaps?
_________________________
-Ben
HT v2.0 !
HT v1.0

Top
#143328 - 07/12/06 03:44 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: TrapVector]
alan Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 3191
Loc: Toronto/New York/Dwight
Hi TrapVector,

If you'd prefer to use direct radiators for surrounds, the M22 and M2 tonal balance is closer to the M60s than the M3s'.
If the room is on the larger side (greater than 2,500 cu. ft), get the M22s, if smaller, the M2s will be fine.
_________________________
Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert

Top
#143329 - 07/13/06 06:18 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: alan]
TrapVector Offline
newbie

Registered: 05/11/06
Posts: 4
Hello Jc, Homedad, INANE, and Mr. Loft.
Placement is indeed the issue at hand. Their family room where the speakers will go opens to a kitchen, which is separated by a three foot high ledge. Their couch is pushed back against the ledge. The surround speakers would sit on either side of this ledge, which is why I don't want to get the QS8's. That said, the room is 17.5 x 13.5 feet, so I think that's just under 2500 cubic feet. Looks like M2's it is. I appreciate all the advice. I know it is honest.

Top
#143330 - 08/19/06 02:09 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: TrapVector]
ajbriddell Offline
newbie

Registered: 05/31/05
Posts: 2
This reply may be late, but helpful..
I have a 7.1 (actually a 6.1) set-up. Fronts are M-22tis, VP-150 Center, QS-8's for surrounds, and M-2's for rear surrounds.

I started with a second set of QS-8's for the rear surrounds, but because of the open nature of my theater room I was not happy with the second set of QS-8's. I returned them for a pair of M2's so the rear surround was directed back at the listening environment.

I COULD NOT BE MORE IMPRESSED...

I highly recommend this set-up. I have an SVS 25-31+ sub and my basement thunders when I watch movies.

I love the QS-8's, they just were not right for my setting.

Just my humble opinion and advice..

AB

Top
#143331 - 08/19/06 04:20 PM Re: M3's or M22's for Surrounds [Re: TrapVector]
SirQuack Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13341
Loc: Iowa
I would also like to see a sketch, normally the surrounds for 5.1 go to the left/right of the listening position, unless you don't have that as an option. I prefer the Q's for surrounds, but that is just me.
_________________________
M80s-VP180-QS8s-EP600-2xEP350 Denon3808 Outlaw7700
M22-OWM22-VP100-Denon2805
Audio Nirvana

Top



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.