I completely agree with your statement .
However , what this has anything to do w/ the 'better components, better sound' claim?

It seems many here are very loyal to Axiom's objective philosphy of establishing the connection between technical measurements and real listeners’ impressions of the products in double blind testing. For the most part this message board is very objective.

I think the majority of us would be singing a different tune (maybe even a few of us would have purchased them), if Ninja would have established any sort of connection with Axiom. Either getting the "o.k" with Axiom during R&D phase of the crossover, creating some sort of partnership (being able to advertise M22 crossover) on their website, or even sending the crossover for measurements and DB testing.

Considering the fact Ninja is profiting off using the design/r&d of the M22 loudspeaker, I thought it was strange about the whole patent thing. Anyways, I think one of the above would have helped market his product better.

Shaka, when the walls fell...

That is the only part I do agree with, which is why I am still looking into producing a XO with Soniccaps etc., with the same XO point as the stock M22. It has me very intrigued.

Sokath, his eyes opened...

[quote=JaimeG]
Absolutely nothing. I was referring to the two posts above that one. I should have quoted the relevant lines.

Let Ian borrow your 22's with the added XO, and let's fire up the science.