8962 Members
11 Forums
22096 Topics
390563 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#249904 - 03/02/09 04:31 PM
Re: Outlaw and Emotiva products...?
[Re: Adrian]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 12/08/08
Posts: 1361
Loc: New Orleans
|
NO, NO. It goes in front of the projector to make 965" image of the Moon!
_________________________
Panny 3000 PJ, 118" Carada, Denon 3300, PS3, Axiom QS8, PSB 5T, B&W sub, levitating speaker wire
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#249922 - 03/02/09 05:49 PM
Re: Outlaw and Emotiva products...?
[Re: Zimm]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 11/16/08
Posts: 1789
Loc: Indiana you hoser!!!!
|
I'm beginning to understand that high end audio circles are populated by mostly A.D.D.survivors. And when I mention A.D.D. I'm talking about the... hey look, a pretty flower.
_________________________
My Stuff :
M80's QS8's VP150 EP800 Denon 4802 Emotiva XPA-3 Samsung BD-P3600 Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#249939 - 03/02/09 07:59 PM
Re: Outlaw and Emotiva products...?
[Re: Micah]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 02/06/09
Posts: 3280
Loc: Western Maryland, USA
|
No, A.D.D. is:
Recorded on analog tape Mixed in the digital domain Mastered digitally
_________________________
Pioneer VSX-1018AH-K, PDP-5020FD, DV-79AVi Axiom M22s, VP150, QS8s Sony PS3, surround backs -Chris
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#249957 - 03/02/09 11:56 PM
Re: Outlaw and Emotiva products...?
[Re: ClubNeon]
|
axiomite
Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 6716
Loc: Canada
|
That and OCD. OK, this is starting to bug me. I have been reading spec sheets to see what they say and its all obfusculated up. One Denon gives a max power rating, the 3808 does not. Maranz 7002/8002 is the same. It only gives the max per channel info.
_________________________
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#249960 - 03/03/09 12:40 AM
Re: Outlaw and Emotiva products...?
[Re: fredk]
|
veteran
Registered: 10/19/03
Posts: 129
Loc: east central Wisconsin
|
I remember Julian Hirsch, the head tester for Stereo Review, giving less than stellar reveiws of amps and receivers that didn't make their specified output.
I just went to Sound and Vision online, and apparently it is now perfectly OK to come up short. I read glowing reviews of a new Denon, an Onkyo and a few others. Amazing how they are rated at, for example, 140X7, but then in parenthesis farther down it says (two channels driven). In fact, I believe it was an Onkyo with a rave review. The sentence was along the lines of "with one channel driven, it easily beat its specified power, and it came close to its rating, even with 5 channels driven." Of cours, all 7 channels was a bit less output yet.
This is a load of crap. Amplifiers and receivers should be rated as watts per all channels driven into 8/4 ohms from 20-20k at .01% distortion. They should need to meet their ratings.
Heck, one of the reviews showed that a 90X7 receiver put out 85x5 and 80X7, but then their was an asterisk behind the results. When I looked at the asterisk on the bottom of the test results, it said that this power was sustained for several MILLISECONDS before thermal protection reduced power output to 1/3 of that. Is that somehow real world? This tells me that if I bought this 90X7 reciever, I could expect protection to limit it to about 27X7. Come on...that is 6db of headroom lost!
I am not trying to be a butthead, but this is wrong. Don't play games. List power as watts per channel continuous (not short transient bursts), all channels driven into 8 and 4 ohms (dual ratings) from 20-20kHz (full spectrum white noise, not a simple 1kHz sine wave) at .01% THD (to keep all the players honest!).
Apples to apples!
_________________________
"Life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness"...Go Packers! and Go Badgers!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|