8975 Members
11 Forums
22144 Topics
391649 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#278255 - 11/09/09 02:11 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: CatBrat]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 05/03/03
Posts: 17421
Loc: NoVA
|
I don't think that's the case at all. If you can get the M80s, do get the M80s.
_________________________
DON'T... call me stupid!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#278259 - 11/09/09 02:23 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: Ken.C]
|
axiomite
Registered: 10/05/06
Posts: 6202
Loc: PEI, Canada
|
If you play a lot of highly compressed MP3s or use a crappy sound source like an iPod then the M60s might be just a tiny bit more forgiving of compressed or poorly recorded music. Not a lot more forgiving though, the M60s are still extremely accurate and bring out the worst in the worst recorded music. More importantly though, they bring out the best in the nicely recorded music or movies.
However, for just about anything else, movies or music, M80s seem to have a slight edge. Of course that is what the M80 folk keep trying to convince us M60 owners anyways. <snicker>
_________________________
I'm Riffing. People usually stop me when I'm riffing. Or carry on without me. That's also an option.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#278282 - 11/09/09 03:52 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: Murph]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10364
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
|
Murph has it right, at least from my experiences with M80s/M60s. I found M60s to be a little more forgiving for poor recordings allowing me to listen to them longer and louder, while the M80s just sounded great with everything except poor recordings which forced me to stop listening to a few songs at louder levels as they sounded terrible.
_________________________
Jason ----------------- TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT! My HT
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#278304 - 11/09/09 05:08 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: jakewash]
|
aficionado
Registered: 05/14/09
Posts: 670
Loc: Vancouver
|
1200 cubic feet?
Call me crazy, but unless you want to play at ridiculous (and I mean ridiculous) volume, M22 with a sub is all you need, especially if you are watching movies in there.
Edited by Potatohead (11/09/09 05:13 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#278307 - 11/09/09 05:26 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: Potatohead]
|
axiomite
Registered: 06/22/03
Posts: 6695
Loc: The Peoples Republic of Il.
|
You're not crazy, that's mighty small room for the M80 imo.
_________________________
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#278332 - 11/09/09 07:41 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: CatBrat]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 08/27/07
Posts: 3250
Loc: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
If you want great sound at low volume, the M80s are one of a kind. I don't know the M60s, but I also own the M22s and even if they are good at low volume, the M80s are a notch over.
_________________________
E = MC2 = ((2M80 + VP180 + 4QS8)/(EP800 + EP500))^(ADA1500 x D2v) Audiobytes! 2M22! 2VP150!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#278334 - 11/09/09 08:15 PM
Re: M60 vs M80
[Re: EFalardeau]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 07/24/04
Posts: 1346
Loc: Oak Ridge, NC
|
I have the 60's - They are awesome - at any volume - distortion free and extremely accurate. I would go deaf long before the speakers maxxed out.
_________________________
"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|