|
3 registered (Ken.C, ClubNeon, medic8r),
70
Guests and
4
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
8964 Members
11 Forums
22103 Topics
390681 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#44774 - 05/04/04 11:41 AM
Re: Odd question 80's vs 60's vs 50's
|
connoisseur
Registered: 05/16/02
Posts: 1093
Loc: Ontario, Canada
|
Never, I'm sure there will be many people who will recommend the 60's, but according to the powers that be (search old posts by Alan), the 60's are very close to the 80's in sound. If you don't like the "forwardness" of the 80's, it's doubtfull you will enjoy the 60's any better. My bet would be for the more "laid back" M50's.
_________________________
Shawn
Epic 80/600 + M3's + Custom Finish Algonquin V3's
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#44775 - 05/04/04 12:20 PM
Re: Odd question 80's vs 60's vs 50's
|
veteran
Registered: 02/17/04
Posts: 120
Loc: Tennessee
|
how big is the room? how far do you have them from the wall? how far apart are they?
please let us know because this may be a good example of why users shouldn't always go for the bigger_is_better speaker.
i still say that the m80s should be designated as (primarily) stereo use while the m60s should be more sufficient for HT use. IMHO
you could contrast this to paradigm users. i know a lot of paradigm users who prefer the studio 60s for home theater and the studio 100s for stereo use.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#44776 - 05/04/04 12:34 PM
Re: Odd question 80's vs 60's vs 50's
|
connoisseur
Registered: 05/13/02
Posts: 4559
Loc: western canada
|
I would agree with real80sman.
If you really don't like the forward sound and you've tinkered with all you can in your room (it is evident that you've discovered swapping amps makes little difference), Axioms may not be the speaker choice for you. However, if you do want to try something different, the M50/M40/M3 are about the only different line you can get. The change is subtle though so if the present sound is really overwhelming, you may want to look completely elsewhere for main speakers.
There are many comparable brands out there for quality but you will be looking at a bit more cost compared to Axiom. Of the brands i've heard lately and really liked compared to my Axiom, i would suggest you look at Paradigm, Monitor Audio, Tannoy or even PSB.
_________________________
"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth. Research begets reality."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#44777 - 05/04/04 01:08 PM
Re: Odd question 80's vs 60's vs 50's
|
buff
Registered: 08/14/03
Posts: 49
Loc: Chicago, IL
|
sounds like u dont like the forward sound - maybe u can go for the onix rockets.
_________________________
JOEY's PC Sound System:
Polk LSi7 (x4, mains and rears) and SVS 25-31PC+ (sub)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#44778 - 05/04/04 01:36 PM
Re: Odd question 80's vs 60's vs 50's
|
connoisseur
Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 3127
Loc: Toronto/New York/Dwight
|
Hi NeverHappy,
How far back are you sitting from the M80s, and what are the room dimensions? Did you buy the M80s new four months ago directly from Axiom? Or did they come from a former retailer in Canada, or a previous owner?
The M60s have ever so slightly less output in the midrange and highs than the M80s, but overall they are extremely similar in tonal balance. Not so the M50s, which are quite a bit softer sounding and less detailed in the mids and highs. The M40s are even more laid-back than the M50s in this respect.
The M80s really sound their best in larger rooms when you are at least 12 feet from them, although currently I have a pair set up adjacent to a pair of M22s barely 8 feet away, and the M80s sound wonderful, but they are difficult to set up at that distance and still get a continuous soundstage.
Perhaps it's the source material. Certainly the M80s, like the M22s and M60s, are relentlessly revealing of bad recordings, but with good ones, they are remarkable. The other day, my mega-changer, running on random, selected a Best of Stevie Wonder compilation, and there is a great cut musically--something about "the City. ."--came on. His vocal is awful--heavily EQ'd, and I think the mike preamp was overloading, because there is audible distortion, yet most of the backup instruments are okay.
I could barely listen to it, were it not so good musically. Then the changer switched to a Sampler CD from Mapleshade Records, "Wild Child: Mapleshade's Music Festival" (08132). What a contrast! The Mapleshade recording quality is a revelation on either the M80s or M22s. Horns and saxes with no harshness, wonderfully natural vocals and percussion, and ambient "room sound" that puts you right there.
As I listened, I thought to myself, "fine and accurate music reproduction really does come down to the loudspeakers and the quality of the original recording." The rest, assuming reasonably competent amplifier and electronic design, is all nuances, so tiny as to be largely insignificant.
Regards,
_________________________
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#44781 - 05/04/04 04:01 PM
Re: Odd question 80's vs 60's vs 50's
|
devotee
Registered: 02/22/04
Posts: 346
Loc: Wisconsin, USA
|
Well...there you have it. The man certainly sounds like he knows what he's talking about. I guess the only real question not asked yet, NeverHappy, is what is your musical tastes? And what is your music to movie ration (30/70)? The mere fact that you have a 7.1 going is an indication to me that you like to watch movies.
What I can tell you about my situation. I have never listened to the M80s, but I do own a pair of M60s and I also run a 7.1. M60s, VP150, QS8s, M2s in a 15x20x15H room and the 60s are my just about my favorite speakers in the mix. In fact the only ones I hesitate on are the M2s. I wonder if I'd prefer the M22s such as you have? But...it's all a fairly new set (1 month). I suppose it's fair to say I'm still tweaking...all the time.
So there you go. A fair pair of questions and a little of me babbling.
_________________________
"We're on the island of Misfit Toys"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|