Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Did they look at you funny when you said you couldn't wait to smoke Dave when you got home?
Didn’t quite phrase it that way. Remember for some time my boss' policy is don‘t ask don‘t tell. Come to think of it we didn’t have to use it that often since when Dave was available he partied almost every night. Question; when I rip a CD to FLAC with MediaMonkey, is the only difference between compression level, the speed at which the rip will happen? There is no difference in sound quality?
It’s by far the biggest difference but higher compression level will also result in slightly smaller compressed files but most people don’t think it’s enough to waste the extra time. Another issue with using higher compression levels with FLAC is that it requires more computing power to uncompress and play on the fly which causes problems for some portable players. But as Efalardeau said no matter the compression level you can still uncompress all the original data non is discarded.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 02:55 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
fredk
|
01/20/09 03:47 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 04:08 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
fredk
|
01/20/09 06:07 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 07:02 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
CV
|
01/20/09 07:17 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 07:30 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
terzaghi
|
01/20/09 12:45 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
myrison
|
01/20/09 12:47 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Kruncher
|
01/20/09 02:15 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
jakewash
|
01/20/09 04:27 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 04:32 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Kruncher
|
01/20/09 04:41 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 04:50 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
fredk
|
01/20/09 07:28 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/20/09 07:40 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
pmbuko
|
01/20/09 07:47 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Worfzara
|
01/20/09 09:12 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
EFalardeau
|
01/20/09 09:17 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/21/09 04:38 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
BoB/335
|
01/24/09 03:47 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/24/09 05:35 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
BoB/335
|
01/24/09 03:01 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
BoB/335
|
01/24/09 03:02 PM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
grunt
|
01/25/09 05:50 AM
|
Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Kruncher
|
01/25/09 04:55 PM
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,949
Posts442,510
Members15,619
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,071
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|