You know, I'm bad at this stuff and I honestly don't really care, but...
Quote:
equipment that is many times more sensitive than human ears
The flawed assumption here - for me - is that science can measure everything that can be experienced. I agree that ears probably can't do everything that equipment can, but why is it necessarily the case that equipment can do everything ears (and a brain) can?
I know, flat earth. I get that a lot. Just making conversation.