|
|
 Re: new VP100 - something wrong?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Quote:
I found that positioning was a very critical factor in satisfying use of my
I didn't quite catch that last part, Tom. You were cutting out.
|
|
|
Re: new VP100 - something wrong?
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102 |
Last edited by Hutzal; 01/08/07 10:51 PM.
|
|
|
Re: new VP100 - something wrong?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
newbie
|
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4 |
hello all,
I received the vp150 a few days ago - what a difference! vp150 sounds less strained and clearer. The front sound stage is also seamless with the m22s.
great speaker. spend the extra $150 in you're considering the vp100.
|
|
|
Re: new VP100 - something wrong?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
I think you did have something wrong with your 100 as mine is also a perfect match to my M22's. Glad you are happy with the 150, eliminates the what if question.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,480
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
978
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
