Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
ereed #157176 01/31/07 08:27 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I can remember when I added my sub to my prologic system all those years ago, it really enhanced the feel of the movies and the prologic was not that great for surround effects.

Now that I have a 6.1 system, I find it hard to think about not having the surrounds, they immerse you into the movie that much more and your M60's should be able to do an admirable job with LFE till you can afford the Sub.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
real80sman #157177 01/31/07 01:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
I agree with Shawn....
Go for the sub and pick up some of those 50% off, $30 Polks that Circuit City has periodically. They won't amaze you the way the QS series will, but they'll still offer something so the sound isn't all "in front of you".


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
MarkSJohnson #157178 01/31/07 02:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
Sub first!

I even used BOSE (God forgive me) for surrounds for a while.

Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
ereed #157179 01/31/07 05:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45
B
buff
Offline
buff
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45
I agree with previous recommendations to get the sub first - especially if you're mostly using your setup for movies. You can always pick up a pair of cheap speakers to use for surrounds until you can afford a good pair. While this isn't ideal, it will work. If you were mostly going to listen to multi-channel music, then I'd go with a good pair of surrounds first. Most music won't dip down past what the M60s can produce.

Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
BudgetAudiophile #157180 01/31/07 06:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189
I agree with half of the earlier posts (never easy to decide is it? ).

I vote for QS8s now, sub later. Another reason being that the QS8 design is quite stable and shouldn't change much, as compared to the advancements and price drops in quality subs happening all the time. You'll probably get more sub for less $ later on when you are ready.


-Dave

M80s VP150 QS8s EP500s
ravenmanor.com/cinema/
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
dllewel #157181 01/31/07 06:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
C
frequent flier
Offline
frequent flier
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Get the surrounds first so that you can enjoy HT, SACD, DVD-A, DTS music. There are more sounds effects with surrounds than bass, not unless you watch a lot of action movies. Even if you watch action movies, bass note doesn't play all the time.

bottom line, you get more bang for buck with surrounds, but you will NEED a sub at some point. When that comes, you will FEEL the movie instead of HEARING it.

Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
Cintel7 #157182 01/31/07 07:09 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
I would say since you have the M60s, go for the QS8s. I just got my system hooked up last sunday and i LOVE the QS8's. They are simply amazing, I didn't listen to any SACD, but I sourced my 2 channel CDs through the surrounds and man, it sounded just simply amazing.

For movies as well, they just dissapear into the room, like you don't even know where they are, you just hear sounds coming from the left and the right, its great.

I have mine sitting on some "Premo" soup cans to expose the bottom woofer (I think Bridgeman patented the idea). My friends argued that they thought Campbells cans would work better, I may have to do some critical listening to get to the bottom of this.


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
ereed #157183 01/31/07 08:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi ereed,

I'd second Hutzal's suggestion. The QS8s are positively uncanny at times at recreating ambience effects in movie soundtracks, even very subtle ones like phones ringing, bird sounds, crickets, and wind and weather effects.

You'll have decent bass with the M60s until you add the sub later on. (I think Bridgman used Habitant soup cans to support his QS8s,in recognition of Canada's dual heritage).


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
alan #157184 02/01/07 02:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189
Quote:

...The QS8s are positively uncanny at times...




LOL


-Dave

M80s VP150 QS8s EP500s
ravenmanor.com/cinema/
Re: Surrounds or Subs first?
dllewel #157185 02/01/07 09:12 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
Did someone say can?




Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,990
Posts442,726
Members15,646
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,851
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (Cork), 582 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4