Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Why not Marantz?
#15908 07/22/03 06:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14
jazznut Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14
In all these many months which I have been reading and occasionally posting, there have not been really any comments for or against Marantz. Ownership changes and technology advancements would seem to have brought them back around to a very viable contender.
I have loked at the new 7300 series and wonder why this isn't coming up in commentary as a player for our products and again why the no mention?
Can users of the marantz or knowledgable shoppers please educate me about this fine old name and where they are missing it since they are so void of commentary here on the message boards?

Re: Why not Marantz?
#15909 07/22/03 07:58 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I love old Marantz equipment. It's solid, well made, sounds good, and is gorgeous. That said, I've never owned a piece of it that was completely functional. I'm thinking about having my 2220B fixed up, but we'll see.

Anyway, I've heard bad things about the quality on the 7200s, and I didn't find their lineup to be that good a value at the moment, at least when I was comparing to H/K. What I noticed was the 6.1 vs. 7.1 and the lack of all channel 192/24 processing until you get up to the 7300. Also, until you get to the 6300, you don't get B channel speakers. Then you have to go to 7300 to get multiroom.

Also, they're not as pretty as they used to be.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Why not Marantz?
#15910 07/22/03 09:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 62
500 Offline
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 62
I second that, those things are ugly.

Re: Why not Marantz?
#15911 07/22/03 09:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Not to mention their bad website.

Re: Why not Marantz?
#15912 07/22/03 09:56 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 737
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 737
Believe it or not, but that did play a part in what I eventually bought. If I couldn't get the information I needed quickly and easily, I didn't bother to screw around with the hardware. I figure that any company that can't take the time to provide me with an easy point of access for the data I want doesn't deserve my business.

Rocket, specifically, lost my money because of this.

Re: Why not Marantz?
#15913 07/22/03 10:14 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
lucky for you, too!

Re: Why not Marantz?
#15914 07/23/03 12:50 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
i helped my next door neighbor put together a 6.1 system using a marantz receiver,and the sound is great,but,to use and set all the functions is very difficult,if you are thinking about getting one,spend some time with it in the store and see if its user friendly enough for you,i personally found it to be a big pain in the....ron


Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,119 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4