Re: Denon AVR-4806 vs. ARCAM AVR-350
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 93
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 93 |
All- Thnaks for the input. My issue is not around speaker balancing etc though as I am a vetran with the SPL meter/calibration. My issue is truly around equalization. I have an SMS-1 and have my frequency response from 20-100hz pretty flat. My issue is in the high frequencies on 2 channel. The sound is too harsh and fatiguing at high volumes. I know this is not an issue of the speakers, b/c in my old room they sounded great. I have laid down all the padded rugs and moved furniture to the extent that my wife will let me. I also cut the treble function on my HK, but that was not enough and did not solve the issue. Just trying to figure out which receiver will likely have the most impact on softening those high frequencies.
M60
VP150
2x QS8
EP500
HK 7300
DENON DVD-3910
Sony 60" SXRD
|
|
|
Re: Denon AVR-4806 vs. ARCAM AVR-350
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Y’all are confusing Audysey EQ with speaker balancing. Two completely different things, although they do work hand in hand.
Speaker balancing / calibration should always be done with a meter and test tones. Audysey is very good, but after you run it, you’ll still want to verify the results with your meter and most likely change settings to some degree.
Where Audysey shines and does what a meter can never do, is add a multi point EQ to each speaker in the room and change the speaker’s sonic characteristics to match the room’s unique sonic characteristics. Again, you can later change these settings, but will probably leave them be.
Some audiophiles will gasp in disgust with the mention of using an equalizer, but they really need to climb out of the dark ages and give it a try.
I can toggle back and forth between the Audysey settings and no EQ and just can’t believe how better it sounds with the EQ on. Everywhere I sit in the room, I am sitting in a sweet spot. The sound is much more enveloping and enjoyable.
As far as recommending a receiver, I’d need to know if HMDI audio from HD / BR players is important to you. If so, you really need to be a bit more picky…….
|
|
|
Re: Denon AVR-4806 vs. ARCAM AVR-350
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
So, Mike, it sounds like you're pretty satisfied with that Marantz, eh?
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: Denon AVR-4806 vs. ARCAM AVR-350
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 93
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 93 |
As far as recommending a receiver, I’d need to know if HMDI audio from HD / BR players is important to you. If so, you really need to be a bit more picky…….
Not concerned w/HDMI as I route from source to TV and have the necessary connections. I have also considered the Marantz SR8001 based somewhat on your ravings. Do you think it could assist w/my high freqencies where the HK7300 did not (Using Treble cut of -4)? Thanks Mike.
M60
VP150
2x QS8
EP500
HK 7300
DENON DVD-3910
Sony 60" SXRD
|
|
|
Re: Denon AVR-4806 vs. ARCAM AVR-350
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Tom and DK,
I am not completely satisfied with the Marantz, but that’s just me. I’ve come to the conclusion that Neverhappy took my screen name.
I think right now, for HD / BR HDMI lossless sound, either the Marantz 8001 or the Denon 4806 are the best two receivers on the market – considering price. My Marantz has an issue with discrete 6 /7 channel lossless PCM which the Denon does not. I just heard today this has been resolved with the latest batch of units being shipped. No word if Marantz will offer a firmware up date for current owners though. Other than that, I have no burning desire to buy a replacement. I don’t even need an external amp for my room. If I pin the volume, I can get an average spl of 105 db (with higher peaks) in my 1800 cubic foot room with the sub off. – and it sounds mighty fine….
I wasn’t trying to rave or put a plug in for any particular receiver with my earlier post. I am just making a distinction between Audysey and speaker calibration. And yes, I think that it will help you with your room, DK. You can run Audysey and let it do its thing, then go into the manual calibration mode and tweak these settings to your liking if they don’t completely satisfy you. Audysey will change the frequency response of EVERY speaker at numerous points after it runs test tones from each speaker six times for six different mic positions.
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k
You can then select to use the EQ settings as is, your own settings, flat or front. Flat changes all speakers to sound the same, front changes them all to sound like the mains. I wasn’t too impressed with flat or front. I wasn’t too impressed with MY settings either. Audysey is definitely smarter than I am….
When you run the set up, it also calculate speaker size, X-over point, delay and channel trim. Mine were very close and all I changed was a half a db hear and there. I also changed X-over points and tried running my M80’s as large and then small. I ended up changing them to small after tweaking with the Avia test disk (Audysey had the mains and center set to large). The LFE channel is smoother and more imersive with the mains and center set to small as it cycles back and forth from each channel to the sub. Don't ask me why....beats the hell out me. It was a blow to my pride to call my mighty M80's as "small", but I'm OK with that decloration of inferior manhood now. I've got a really big sub that compensates.
|
|
|
Re: Denon AVR-4806 vs. ARCAM AVR-350
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Nice post, Mike. Thanks for the information and ongoing tutelage. It's cool how we learn from each other.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
705
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|