Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357 |
For your convenience, here's the link to the pictures of my room. [url= ]my room[/url]
The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116 |
The 500 can definitely pressurize that room. In my space, it makes no difference whether I have LFE or LFE+main. Try this however. Dial your 500 to about 7 o'clock and 40Hz. Set your trim to full. Set the Denon's cross-over to 40Hz (the 3801 should have this...I have the 2105 and it has it). Then set the Denon LFE gain to +3. Set the sub's distance to 5 feet greater than actual. And don't forget to experiment with the phase switch. I have a whopping 14dB difference in my room that is phase switch dependent. Use and SPL meter to judge this. Let us know how it sounds. Also check to see that the straps on the back of the 80s bridge the woofers too.
House of the Rising Sone Out in the mid or far field Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
I would also try the sub crawl to check for the best placement but with your room setup you will most likely end up up where it is unless you rearrange the room.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
And don't forget to experiment with the phase switch. I have a whopping 14dB difference in my room that is phase switch dependent. Wow... I have just left the phase switch on my 500 set to 0.. largely because I don't know exactly what it does. Maybe I should experiment with that too. Mojo, I am not sure about other denons but on my 3808 the LFE channel can only be adjusted from -10db to 0db... ?
-David
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357 |
The 500 can definitely pressurize that room. In my space, it makes no difference whether I have LFE or LFE+main. Try this however. Dial your 500 to about 7 o'clock and 40Hz. Set your trim to full. Set the Denon's cross-over to 40Hz (the 3801 should have this...I have the 2105 and it has it). Then set the Denon LFE gain to +3. My Denon 3801 doesn't have a adjustable cross-over. When the speakers are set to "small" the receiver cross-over is set to a 80 Hz default. I also just looked in the manual and it doesn't say anything about adjusting the LFE. I am assuming you mean setting the subwoofer to + 3 dB when I run my "test tones"? The only adjustments I have for bass output are my "test tone" settings, and the "tone control" which adjusts bass and treble. Here is a link to Denon's web site where you can download the manual for my receiver. I assume it will help with suggestions on setup because it's an older model and everyone is different. manualThanks again for everyone's time.
The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738 |
Axiom probably recommend you to keep your front speakers at small to keep the demaning load off your Denon and transfer it over the EP500.
It takes a lot more energy to produce low frequencies than high ones. If you set your fronts to large and LFE to both main and sub, your Denon amp will have to work that much harder to reproduce low frequencies to your main's (M80’s). That seems silly when you have a 500 watt amp in your EP500. It’s all about adding headroom for your amp to prevent clipping.
When you go to a monster receiver or separates and have 150w/c or more to play with, then there is more headroom for your amp, and you can set the mains to Large and LFE to both.
Your M80’s are capable of handling tremendous levels of low frequencies, but you amp may not. It’s all about headroom and not clipping!
Paul
paul
Axiom M80, VP180, Qs8, EP500 Epson 3020 Rotel RB-880 Denon AVR-990
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
the 3808 has 130wpc and I have my my m80's set to large with the the sub set to LFE +main. I have not had a problem with dynamically demanding scenes or music yet. IF I do, I will change the mains to small and the sub to LFE only.
for now, I like having the low end comming from both the m80's and the 500.
-David
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738 |
I agree 100%, I bought the M80's because I wanted a full range speaker. If I was going to set main speakers to small, I should/would have bought the M22's.
130 watts is lots of power depending on the size of room and how loud you like to listen to music. You should have lots of headroom to play with.
I like having the LFE comming out of both too.
Paul
paul
Axiom M80, VP180, Qs8, EP500 Epson 3020 Rotel RB-880 Denon AVR-990
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357 |
There's no worries of clipping. My RPA-1 powers my M80s.
The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
|
|
|
Re: getting more bottom end from sub
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Here's my attempt at explaining phase. Look at this simple waveform: The horizontal line represents the speaker cone when it is at rest. Anything above the line tells the speaker cone to move outward. Anything below the line tells the speaker cone to move inward. As we all know, speaker cones move back and forth creating varying pressure waves that radiate out into the room and eventually reach our ears. The phase characteristic of sound is basically the position or orientation of the waveform with respect to some point in time. In these examples, the reference point is the vertical amplitude axis. Now, with only a single sound source, the phase makes no difference. You can move it 90 degrees: or 180 degrees: and it will make no detectable difference in the sound you hear. Where phase starts to matter is when you have more than one sound source in your room. Watch what happens when you have two sound waves and one of them is 180 degrees out-of-phase with the other: Notice that there is an equal amount of signal above and below the line. When you add them up (as your ear would do), the result is absolutely no sound. Keep in mind that this is an idealized situation and rarely do you ever get a complete canceling out of sound in the real world. Usually you only get partial canceling, as would happen if we were 90 degrees out of phase in this example: But how does this all apply to the phase switch, and why would you ever want to use the 180 setting? The answer is that it all depends on the arrangmeent of your speakers. The reason you don't have to worry about adjusting the phase of your two main speakers is that most people arrange them so they are both the same distance from their ears. The sub is often placed somewhere else, often much further or closer to the listener's ears than the main speakers. The phase switch allows you to compensate for the unpleasant sound cancellations or reinforcements that may occur in the bass range that exists within the crossover thresshold between the sub and the main channels. I probably could have worded this better, but it's lunch time now and I'm hungry.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
997
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|