 Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
devotee
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309 |
I decided to give Audyssey another try, but I still have mixed feelings about it. It doesn't seem to get the distances or channel levels exactly right, and some are way off. For example, it had my left surround about 2.5 dB too hot.
But my question is why does Audyssey calculate that the distance to my sub is 1.7 feet when it's actually 6.7 feet? Should I leave it alone or change it?
I started out with nothing & I've still got most of it left
M60 VP160 QS8 EP350
M22 VP100
Algonquins
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
How do you know your left surround is to hot? The room characteristics and speaker placement play a huge role in the end results. My right surround is 2 dB's different than my left surround, because my right surround has no wall behind to reinforce things.
The sub distance can somtimes be different based on internal delay in the sub amp circuitry, especially in DSP subs. However, normally the setup has it further away than the physical distance.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
devotee
|
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309 |
After I ran Audyssey, I checked all the levels with my sound meter. And I don't have a DSP sub (EP350 v2).
My initial reaction after listening for a few hours to a movie is that the sound is fuller, but slightly colored and artificial. Not unpleasant, just more noticeable.
I started out with nothing & I've still got most of it left
M60 VP160 QS8 EP350
M22 VP100
Algonquins
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
As long as you had the SPL meter in the EXACT location left/right/height and orientated straight up, I can see your concern, the SPL reading should be the same. However, the dB levels on the receiver might be a few dB's different to achieve the same reading.
In regards to the sub that is strange as well. My EP350v3's using my old Denon 2805 setup give me the exact distance from the sub's voice coil on the driver to the mic. Now the EP600 is another story, because of the DSP, the receiver puts my 600 about 10ft further than it actually is....I don't have Audyssey.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
Which receiver are you using?
When you do the audyssey setup are you doing 3,4, or more locations? I have found Audyssey really needs the extra locations to get its EQ right.
Do you have the latest firmware updates for your receiver, if avaialble? There could be other noises that are causing Audyssey to set things up wrong, make sure the room is dead quiet. I do my set ups at 2-3AM when I get home from work.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
devotee
|
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309 |
I've got a Denon 2308CI, so no software issues. I used all 6 locations that it allows, and I did the 3 main seating positions plus another 3 readings about 2 feet in front of those.
Outside noise is a possibility. I shut off the furnace, but there could be some faint road noise affecting the readings. Do you think that could be affecting the sub distance?
Bottom line is still - should I adjust the distance to the actual measurement or go with Audyssey? I suppose I could try both and see if it makes a difference. Maybe I'm stressing over something that really doesn't matter that much?
I started out with nothing & I've still got most of it left
M60 VP160 QS8 EP350
M22 VP100
Algonquins
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Well, you do want your SPL readings to be the same from the primary seating position. The distances and dB levels on the receiver for each speaker can be different, but the goal is to have the same SPL from the desired seat. If your going back and running the receivers pink noise, and the Radio Shack meter has a 2+ difference between the left/right surrounds that is not right. How many times have you run the Audyssey? Maybe you will get different results if you run it again..
The first measurement you take is the crucial one, which sets the distances, dB levels, etc.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
Maybe try only 4 readings. I know the 3808 has had some issues in some rooms with the max 8 readings, not sure why, but when they dropped to 4 or 6 readings it worked right.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200
local
|
|
local
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200 |
When using an SPL meter, you are measuring white noise with all the room problems. When Audyssey measures, it uses sweeps. Also, there is a +/- 2db variance on the SPL and the Audyssey MIC.
The sub distance is a problem. It should not be closer (it could be farther and still be correct). Was there any room noise when you did the test. Thinks like cooling fans can make Audyssey give weird results.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Hey Dave, none of your Home Theater website pictures are working, fyi....
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
devotee
|
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309 |
I'll have to try it again tomorrow and compare the results. Any theories on why I'm getting the weird sub distance readings? I've done the sub crawl and the present position is the best of all possible options.
I started out with nothing & I've still got most of it left
M60 VP160 QS8 EP350
M22 VP100
Algonquins
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200
local
|
|
local
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200 |
Hey Dave, none of your Home Theater website pictures are working, fyi.... Thanks. I am redoing my site and got really started deleting without thinking. They are working again.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Joe, as to difference in the level readings, as I've commented before, there's no good reason to believe that the SPL reading taken with a separate meter(and with human error in reading it possibly a factor)is more accurate(or as accurate)than the result from the Audyssey microphone and built-in meter.
Where the sub difference is shown as being significantly shorter than the actual distance, this would seem to indicate that a nearby reflection is affecting the result. If you had the microphone positioned clear of obstructions for the first central reading, maybe you should try another first reading from about 6-7' away from the sub even if not in the listening position , to see if a similar short measurement results.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
pictures are working again Dave, but it is VERY slowwwwww. Are you hosting your own website? I've got broadband and this is reminding me of the old dial-up days....
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
devotee
|
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309 |
That's a good idea John. If I take just a first reading to verify the setup, will that give me the sub distance? Or will I have to go through the whole multi-position routine? My receiver needs a minimum of 3 readings before it will do the calculations.
I was trying to analyze this situation (the way we engineers tend to do), and it's probably not such a big deal as I'm making it out to be. After all, the distance setting is used to calculate a delay time in microseconds. It seems unlikely that a difference of a couple of thousandths of a seconds would even be noticeable, especially with a long low frequency wave.
I started out with nothing & I've still got most of it left
M60 VP160 QS8 EP350
M22 VP100
Algonquins
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
If your a member on the AVSforum, there is an Audyssey thread in the Audio Receivers/Amps section. Chris from Audyssey is a regular and maybe he could help answer these questions...
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Joe, the first Audyssey reading(usually from the main listening position)is the one that sets the speaker levels, crossovers and distances; the remaining readings are for the purpose of room equalization adjustments. So, if you decide to try the first reading at different positions to check what the sub distance shows, use the least number of readings that give you a result for sub distance.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hello Joe,
While we'd all like to believe that Audyssey's automatic calibration and EQ is an audio panacea, it isn't, and it's error prone. I suggest you use your Radio Shack Sound Pressure Meter and adjust the levels and distances manually. You can tweak the levels of your surround speakers, subwoofer and center channel by ear if necessary later on.
Leave Audyssey Equalization switched off. As you've discovered, with really linear speakers like Axioms, Audyssey may degrade sound quality.
Incidentally, it is pink noise (not white noise) that is used. Pink noise has equal energy per musical octave; white noise has equal energy per frequency, so it's heavily biased towards the upper midrange and high frequencies.
Regards,
Alan
Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 505
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 505 |
Last edited by BoB/335; 01/26/09 05:30 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210 |
Bob, several of us here do use the Avia disc ... it's worth having.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 505
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 505 |
I'll add that to my never ending list!
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
devotee
|
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 309 |
Thanks Alan. For some reason I keep coming back to Audyssey, probably because of the peer pressure on these boards. But frankly, the Axioms by themselves, without any technical help, always sound best.
I started out with nothing & I've still got most of it left
M60 VP160 QS8 EP350
M22 VP100
Algonquins
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200
local
|
|
local
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200 |
Hello Joe,
While we'd all like to believe that Audyssey's automatic calibration and EQ is an audio panacea, it isn't, and it's error prone. I suggest you use your Radio Shack Sound Pressure Meter and adjust the levels and distances manually. You can tweak the levels of your surround speakers, subwoofer and center channel by ear if necessary later on.
Leave Audyssey Equalization switched off. As you've discovered, with really linear speakers like Axioms, Audyssey may degrade sound quality.
Incidentally, it is pink noise (not white noise) that is used. Pink noise has equal energy per musical octave; white noise has equal energy per frequency, so it's heavily biased towards the upper midrange and high frequencies.
Regards,
Alan Wow! Not sure what to say here. I completely disagree. It is statements like this the make me really wonder... What is the motive. How is it error prone? What experience do you have with the product? I guess all I can really say is with my Axiom's in my room, Audyssey makes a world of difference.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378 |
Audyssey has a tendency to cancel out stuffed animal interference.
LFR1100 Actives,QS10HPx2,QS8x2,EP800,M3x4,M3x2 (Wood),M5HPx2 (Wood),AxiomAir,ADA1500-8,ADA1500-7
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
I just go with the idea if you like the way it sounds with Audyssey then use it, if you don't like it, then turn Audyssey off.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
Audyssey has a tendency to cancel out stuffed animal interference. DOH! I thought you guys had forgotten about my cat toy in the EP500 port problem. Well at least, I didn't go down the Equalizer road with that one. I'd still be home madly tweaking.
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Oh man, that was hilarious. That reminds me, I should check my EP350 at some point...
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Another Audyessy question
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116 |
The whole Audyessy debate is very simple. Play around with setting it up a few times and if you like what it does then keep it, if not, don't sweat it and disable it.
I've done the latter. More to the extreme of resetting the receiver and re-calibrating with a SPL meter like Alan suggested above.
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.
-Max Payne
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,117
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
