Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
qs's as presence speakers?
#259384 05/05/09 03:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
N
Nick B Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
N
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
Since the new dolby format will process a 5.1 signal for front presence speakers I was wondering what a good speaker for the job would be. Atlantic Technology has already designed one specifically for the job for around $400.

Link: http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/speakers/satellite/atlantic-tech-1400-sr-z-height

I bet the qs4 or qs8 would do a much better job that this speaker which only uses a midrange driver in phase or out of phase with the other. The article mentioned they designed this to be a diffusive speaker that wouldn't call attention to itself and blend in. The the qs's are very good at doing that and extending down flat to nearly 80 Hz and are about the same price. What do you guys think? Anyone try this idea?

- Nick

Re: qs's as presence speakers?
Nick B #259386 05/05/09 03:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I agree Nick, I think the QS will be the perfect presence speaker and I think you could even get away with just the QS4 as even less material would run through it than surrounds.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: qs's as presence speakers?
Nick B #259440 05/05/09 11:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: nickboros

The article mentioned they designed this to be a diffusive speaker that wouldn't call attention to itself and blend in.
- Nick


Well, according to the CNET.com review of front height channels on the Onkyo, the front height speakers not only did not call attention to themselves, they could not even tell they were there. Like in, they could not tell a difference in sound when they were hooked up and not hooked up when using direct firing speakers (I believe). Not a good first report on PLIIz. Given the above report, I's think a direct firing M2 might be better. We won't have anyone else's real world testing for a while. I have let go of PLIIz as a 'hold out for' feature.

EDIT: I just went to the article. They do say radiant firing is preferred. This makes sense in theory... see sig. ;o) This whole front height channel thing has got some proving to do in my mind.

Last edited by davekro; 05/05/09 11:55 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: qs's as presence speakers?
Nick B #259444 05/06/09 01:35 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Nick, on a point of terminology, Yamaha refers to the feature that they've had for several years, adding artificial ambience, as "presence" speakers. The Dolby DPLIIz processing of material already naturally in the recording has been termed "height" since it extracts non-directional ambience material(rather than the left and right surround ambience which DPLII sends to side surrounds)which, when present, frequently comes from above.

Since this is non-directional material, wide dispersion speakers such as the QSs would appear to be ideal. Dolby has most frequently been suggesting this as an alternative for someone sitting almost up against the back wall without room for a "7.1 back" setup and instead assigning the unused back channels for a "7.1 height" system.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.



Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 997 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4