|
rear speakers for 7.1 QS-8 vs M2
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 19
frequent flier
|
OP
frequent flier
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 19 |
Hello,
I currently have the M60s, VP150 and QS-8 with an SVS 20-39 sub with a Yamaha 1400. Room is about 14x25x10.
I would like to add two rear speakers for 7.1. I see that most use either the QS-8 or the M2. Since there is a considerable price diff, I was wondering which would be the way to go. Would the quad polar effect of the QS-8 be usefull for this speaker position or are the rear speakers so minor that the direct M2 would be plenty?
THanx
|
|
|
Re: rear speakers for 7.1 QS-8 vs M2
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
buff
|
buff
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 52 |
I have never tried a QS8 for my rear channel in my 6.1 setup, but I do have a M2i there now and it works very well. I have noticed that very little actual sound comes from the rear position, even when watching Gladiator, Which is the only movie I have that plays in DTS 6.1 discreet mode. I can tell you that the 5-6 DVD-As I have sound great from all speakers.
Just my .02
|
|
|
Re: rear speakers for 7.1 QS-8 vs M2
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 438
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 438 |
By all means if you are going to listen to DVD-Audio or SACD get M2's for your rear speakers. The rear channel information in 5.1 music recordings is meant to be listened to with direct radiating speakers. Otherwise, one QS-8 will probably do the trick, since the rear 2 channels in DD and DTS are actually one signal.
One caveat...If you are going to listen to 5.1 DVD-A or SACD and use M2's for your rear speakers, your receiver or pre/pro will need a full set of 7.1 inputs. Many have only one input that is shared by both rear channels.
"Shoot, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff"
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
947
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|