|
Re: Suck It, iPod: Meet the King of Geeky Portable Aud
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9
regular
|
regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9 |
Man you guys really have great senses of humor; funny, very funny.
|
|
|
Re: Suck It, iPod: Meet the King of Geeky Portable Aud
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116 |
Man you guys really have great senses of humor; funny, very funny. I must have missed the joke?
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.
-Max Payne
|
|
|
Re: Suck It, iPod: Meet the King of Geeky Portable Aud
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9
regular
|
regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9 |
I can imagine my life without my 80 gb ipod (state prison, siberia, ...) albeit, it's definitely enhances life.
regarding codecs, Apple's implementation of it's aac codec reproduces sound significanlty better than windows media wma lossless.
All Software music players do just about the same thing, excepting each vendor will tweak published algorithms or write their own using playback code using industry guidlines
I guess what I'm getting at is I play alot of music played at home is from my computer using itunes and many movies are played from disk to home theater using Cyberlink UltaDVD10. Windows implementation of codecs don't sound as rich and ppowerful to mee.
that is comparing windows media player 11 + wma codecs with itunes + apples version of aac
I dislike being strapped to Apple's
|
|
|
Re: Suck It, iPod: Meet the King of Geeky Portable Aud
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9 |
regarding codecs, Apple's implementation of it's aac codec reproduces sound significanlty better than windows media wma lossless. Ahem! You might want to have a second look at the definition of "lossless"...
See Mojo's signature
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
629
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|