Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Looking for some 5.1 advice for a room 16x20x9
cb919 #368379 03/01/12 02:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
A
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
A
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
You guys are incredibly helpful, much appreciated. I am looking towards in-walls only because of the sleek, seamless look. Considering Axiom since everyone has provided such in depth, positive reviews. It appears like the Axiom in-walls come with a back box rather than just the speaker faceplate, which should help the depth. Is that about right?

Re: Looking for some 5.1 advice for a room 16x20x9
ajrainey #368380 03/01/12 02:18 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
That is correct. It requires more space in the wall, but it seems like a good trade-off to me.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Looking for some 5.1 advice for a room 16x20x9
ajrainey #368381 03/01/12 02:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Yes, they are self contained with their own enclosure and the speakers protrude slightly from the wall. As I've mentioned, I also had to do an on wall solution due to room factors. I found Axiom really excelled in the value area for on wall solutions especially. To get similar sound quality to Axiom for on wall I had to spend significantly more money.


Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: Looking for some 5.1 advice for a room 16x20x9
cb919 #368438 03/01/12 09:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
A
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
A
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
My only question for now, I suppose, is if it will be a loss to use the inwall VP100 vs the onwall VP150. Maybe M2s or M3s would be better matches to the VP100 rather than M22s. I'm not really sure!

Re: Looking for some 5.1 advice for a room 16x20x9
ajrainey #368443 03/01/12 10:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I know people hate it when I say this and tend to disagree, but in my experience with Axiom products, the more they cost, the better they sound.

I would avoid the M3's unless it's a small stereo only system. They have a different sound than the rest of the line.

So for me, I would go by looks and price.

Re: Looking for some 5.1 advice for a room 16x20x9
ajrainey #368446 03/01/12 11:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Adam, I'd pick the L&R speakers that work for you 1st including type (i.e. in wall, on wall, in-on walls or full bookshelf). Then for your center you keep with the same type, but you now have a choice of vertical or horizontal. If you go vertical, ideally you get the same as your L&R so you have 3 identical speakers across the front. If a vertical center is not for you (does not matter the reason), then choose between the 100 and 150. Differences in matching are quite subtle, so you'll be fine with whatever you choose.

For instance I had the VP150 which matched perfectly well with my M22's, but when i compared it back to back with the M2, i found the M2 matched my M22's even better than the VP, so I made the switch. That's the short version of the story anyway.

Nothing will be a loss, just slightly different shades of performance and value, all you have to do is pick what works best for you regardless of any opinions we share. Have fun with it!


Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 865 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4