|
|
 timbre match...
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 38
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 38 |
Hello all,
If I were to use M22ti for the front pair, VP150 for center, QS8s for surround and bookshelf speakers for rear pair(as some posters have suggested), would the M2 match the above system in overall sound, or is the M3 a better choice?
|
|
|
Re: timbre match...
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 50
buff
|
|
buff
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 50 |
The M2 should match better since it has 5.25" drivers. All those speakers you listed have 5.25" drivers.
Jason
M80 HP v4, VP160 v4, QS8 v1 (3 in 6.1 layout), SVS PB12-Plus/2, Parasound Halo A21, Denon AVR-X4100W
|
|
|
 Re: timbre match...
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 23
hobbyist
|
|
hobbyist
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 23 |
how about for the epic 80 m2's or m3's? for rears
|
|
|
Re: timbre match...
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Same idea, Rey. The M2s use the same 5 1/4" midrange speakers as the M80s, so should have a bit better match than would the M3s.
Last edited by JohnK; 04/12/04 07:26 AM.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: timbre match...
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 170
veteran
|
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 170 |
Maybe Chess can tell us if the exact same driver is used between speakers!
|
|
|
Re: timbre match...
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351 |
they seem to be - i posted that question a week back or so
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
590
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
