Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
M2s/3s/22s not shielded as well as VP100/150s?
#82334 02/21/05 06:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
TNTguy Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
I have been tempted to try going with 3 M22s as L,R, and a center, but from browsing the forums it sounds as if the M2/M3/M22 speakers are not video shielded as well as the 100/150s. Is that correct?

Re: M2s/3s/22s not shielded as well as VP100/150s?
#82335 02/21/05 06:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I ran an M2 center for a while -- worked OK with only a tiny bit of fringing if I had it "tweeter down" on the TV. Ended up buying a VP100 rather than another M2; partly for the shielding, and partly to see whether the 2nd midrange made a difference.

Having said that, you could do a LOT worse than starting off with 3 M2s and a big honkin' sub. You need a big sub to fill that room... more than you need big mains and center.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M2s/3s/22s not shielded as well as VP100/150s?
#82336 02/21/05 08:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
There was a post out a few years ago about the reduced shielding on the M3s-don't get closer than six inches from a CRT. Not aware if that same stipulation applies to all the other bookshelves, but it sure did for the M3s, had to run mine vertically and inverted to function correctly as a center-and it does that quite well as long as the room isn't too large.

But Yup, there's an ancient post out there talking about it.

Re: M2s/3s/22s not shielded as well as VP100/150s?
#82337 02/21/05 11:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I also have a less-ancient post :

http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=HT&Number=63733&page=&view=&sb=&o=&fpart=1&vc=1

Warning... this post contains some really bad attempts at humour.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M2s/3s/22s not shielded as well as VP100/150s?
#82338 02/22/05 07:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
TNTguy Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
bridgman--Did the VP100 sound better than the M2? Did the second midrange make a difference?

Re: M2s/3s/22s not shielded as well as VP100/150s?
#82339 02/22/05 08:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
It seemed to make a slight difference. I was pretty careful to match the levels but the VP100 still sounded better, which surprised me. Very hard to describe -- "more open" is the usual term but no idea how to translate that into something measurable.

BTW, I noticed that a center composed of 2 M2s wired in parallel sounded a bit better than a single M2 in pretty much the same way.

I found there was a huge jump from "no center" to "single M2 center", but much less jump from "single M2 center" to "dual M2" or VP100. Then again, I can also listen happily with M2 mains and a good sub so the combination of room size (13x23) and listening levels are not too demanding.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (rrlev), 450 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4