Best receiver
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92 |
Alright, I'm fed up with Onkyo support, or lack there of. I've been on hold for ever, trying to get net tune radio working. They won't answer, so I think I'm going to return my receiver, and buy a new one. What's the best under 2 grand. I want 7.1 min, and goes to 4ohm for the m80's. I have about 10 days to make a decision.
thanks,
Rick
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345 |
Denon or Marantz are probably your best bet if you're fed up with Onkyo, although I wouldn't be confident support will be any better. If you have room in your budget, consider the Outlaw separates, who have customer service/support on par with Axiom.
If you're willing to sacrifice the 7.1 (i.e. haven't bought the speakers yet), I will reiterate my broken record suggestion to consider the Arcam receivers. The performance on music is night-and-day better than Japanese units.
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745 Likes: 17
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745 Likes: 17 |
I would love to audition some Arcam components myself.
I was in a store today (another topic for another thread) and some some Rotel as well.
Honestly though, i think the support is best gained from the dealers as opposed to going direclty to the manufactorer. Buy from a reputable dealer.
"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 162
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 162 |
You might want to also look at the Harman Kardon AVR-8000, the back of that is pure quality, gold plated speaker posts even. I also like the Pioneer Elite's, although some here will disagree, for sound I hear H/K and Pioneer are the best among non-seperate receivers. My .01 worth.
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hi ralderman,
I'm repeating what I posted elsewhere: Although THX Ultra and Select certification contains some aspects of dubious benefit or minimal usefulness, the THX requirements for the amplifier output sections are quite rigorous and include the ability to drive 4-ohm loads without current limiting or amplifier shut-down from protection circuitry. The H/K AVR8000 is an excellent example. Monitoring these boards over the last year, I've never seen complaints of Denons (2803, 3803, etc) shutting down with 4-ohm speakers or being power-starved from current limiting.
So look at receivers with THX certification or consider the Denons. By the way, any receiver that will drive 8-ohm loads will have no trouble with 6-ohm loads. It's 4-ohm loads that cause problems with some brands that are basically spec'd for 8-ohm speakers and were never intended to be married to 4-ohm speakers.
Regards,
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92 |
Thanks everyone, I'm going to do some research, the Onkyo I have is THX select, it's a nice receiver, but there's just a few little things that I dislike. I read the specs a little closer, it's 110w per channer @ 8ohm with 2 channels drives from 20 Hz to 20kHz, and 145 @ 6ohm 2 channels driven from 1kHz. The only thing is says about 4 ohm is 2 x 220 Dynamic power output (stereo). The net-tune doesn't work very right, and customer serviceis totally missing. The last thing that bothers me is the lack of power, it just doesn't drive the speakers like I expected.
I wish companies were half as good as Axiom. They definitly have the best customer service.
Thanks agian,
Rick
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40
buff
|
buff
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40 |
I'll second fhw's suggestion of looking into an Outlaw 950/755 combo. It's a little over budget, but IMHO you won't find a receiver in this price range that'll drive your speakers like separates will.
If you decide to go the receiver route, I'd look at Rotel, HK, NAD and Denon.
Good luck.
Big L
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85 |
Hi Alan,
Are the amp requirements for the THX Ultra and Select different? My Onkyo-787 is Select certified, but that has apparently not prevented the receiver from shutting down under 4 ohm loads.
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hi,
Yes, I believe only THX Ultra includes the requirement about driving 4-ohm loads. The "Select" certification is much less rigorous from what I understand. And that would seem to be borne out by your experience with the 787.
Regards,
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: Best receiver
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345 |
Amer,
All THX Select guarantees you in a receiver is Re-EQ capability (which is a good thing) and a a fixed 80Hz crossover for bass redirection to the sub (which is a bad thing if you use towers or microsatellites). There are some dirt-cheap THX Select receivers out there, and I've heard a Kenwood that sounded terrible. Almost all of the performance, power and distortion standards relate to THX Ultra/Ultra2.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,217
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|