When we were at Mojo's comparing the v2s and the Ninja's I commented on how the v2 with the EP600 sounded somewhat like I remember the M60s sounding, so my impressions could be skewed by my M22v1s, as I swear they have more upper end/forwardness than the v2s, although Alan as stated the M22 is virtually unchanged. I can only find the XO layout to be different but looks to be the same parts. It could just be me
Well, Jay, I recently picked up a pair of M22v2s and I have to say I don't get any of the piercing that I got from yours at Mojo's. I found yours to be very precise and forward, but I could never decide if I liked the sound or not. My new v2s, however, I like very much and they have supplanted the M2s in my 'new' 5.1 system for the computer.
As for the 350, it works very well in my large room (30x13x8 opening into the rest of the house). It did take me a couple of weeks to warm up to it, however. My older, smaller, cheaper sub seemed to have more rumble, but after a direct comparison this turned out to be merely distortion. The 350 has plenty of rumble (and much cleaner rumble at that). As far as Hsu and SVS being "better value", that's mostly for Americans. Shipping can be killer for large, square, heavy boxes.
