Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
i had Energy 22 Ref. for about 25 years, and with some program material, they would distort heavily for some seconds, taking in some 500 Watts each. 500W really? You had/have 500W amps? How loud were you listening? Just because a speaker claims a power rating of 500watts or 700watts doesn't mean they use or need any where near that kind of power; most people run at 1-10 watts for a normal 70-80 db level at the listening position with extreme peaks hitting 50-100W for most in home listening experiences.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
Jake,you can calculate how much power is needed to play 115 dB SPL with a speaker's rated sensitivity of 86 dB SPL/anechoic, at 5.5 Ohms (increase that from 86 to around 89 in-room).
i know for a fact that the amp would put out around 725 Watts/ch on fast peaks, and around 400 Watts/ch on steady signals, into 5.5 Ohms. The p.s. voltage: 64Vrms the amp can run fine with 2.2 Ohm speakers, and it can put out as much as 20 amps.
Playback volume was at reference level.
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8 |
You guys are awesome and making me giddy like a school boy going to an all-girls school! Sooo...my receiver can push the Axiom speakers, but an amp would help with more power to smooth out distortion. That being true, in my humble case, where I do not crank my speakers loud (hell, even at -23db on my Yamaha, it's plenty loud...maybe I have sensitive ears, not yet violated by the wonders of sound?), the receiver would be fine unless I notice clipping and distortion, right? And JohnK, leaving the receiver at 8 ohms won't harm the speakers or receiver? Even if the specs on the speakers state 4ohm? Sorry, but this seems too good to be true! I could have these speakers by Feb! Thanks again for the helpful tidbits and banter...it helps me understand more about home theater than the usual watts and power.
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Nah, you don't need an amp if you're not pushing it.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
Don't forget to add in the distance you are listening in the formula like the online amp calculators do, but either way J.B, you listen far too loudly for me. I listen at about 70-85 and peaks hit around 100.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8 |
With a 40" TV, im around 6-8' away...and that's why I don't have to push them? As well as the speakers sounding muddy?
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Sed, a higher power amp than what you have now in your receiver wouldn't "smooth out distortion" if you weren't playing your present equipment loud enough to produce audible amplifier distortion, which you apparently aren't doing.
Leaving the receiver at the 8 ohm default setting couldn't damage the speakers and would be extremely unlikely to damage the receiver. Since more clean power is available at the 8 ohm setting(as mentioned above), the speakers are less likely to be damaged by inadequate power reserves leading to clipping. If very loud levels were played for an extended time(which you don't do)the receiver might overheat, but its internal protective circuit would shut it down, and normal operation would return after it cools down(having given a hint to turn it down a bit).
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
Don't forget to add in the distance you are listening in the formula like the online amp calculators do, but either way J.B, you listen far too loudly for me. I listen at about 70-85 and peaks hit around 100. you say i listen far too loudly; the levels i listen to is the same as in good cinemas. maybe one reason you can't do it (too loud) is that your room is not treated? or maybe the neighbors. i had forgotten to talk, in my previous post, about distance from speakers to MLP; in a small room, i think it should be about 3-4 dB less for each doubling of distance. large rooms lose more,until in open spaces it's 6 dB's.
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422 |
I don't think that Jason (jakewash) was criticizing you, just saying that it was too loud for him.
You are correct though that many (most/all???) of the time when a room has a bunch of treatments in it, the sound that hits someones ears can seem to actually be *less* than an untreated room, thus the ability to play "louder" in a treated room without being painful.
Then, factor in that you might like to listen to things louder too, and that might make up for the difference in the preferred volume. Again, I don't know about Jason's setup, but I didn't see it as being critical.
Farewell - June 4, 2020
|
|
|
Re: Question on HT upgrades
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
i did not think he was criticizing me, only that he probably has different tastes or his room wasn't treated.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,228
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|