Peter, just as a horizontal EP600 as viewed from the usual perspective could appropriately be described as being 45.5" "wide", logic would seem to demand that the same standard be applied to babies. If the person measuring was alongside the baby the measurement should be given as e.g. 21" "wide". If instead that person saw fit to position himself or herself at the head or feet of the baby the description must be 21" "deep". The difference in terminology should cause no confusion, since clearly it would relate to the position of the measurer, not an abnormality in the child. This is an issue which has been overlooked for far too long and it's hoped that this thread will encourage additional serious discussion of the matter.
