Here's the thing.
You can criticize anything you want about any particular double-blind test: The amount of time a person is listening, whether the audio material is familiar, whatever.
Fine. Make a double-blind test that addresses those problems.
Harley can write for pages and pages (and pages and pages), and not a single thing he writes (that I've come across) addresses the primary point of double-blind tests: you know, the double-blind part.
At the extreme, his arguments against "objectivism" could be taken to mean that no one should listen to his opinions, either. If there is no objective viewpoint, then there's simply no point accepting his viewpoint, either. It's a common problem of post-modern flavored thinking.
