Thanks for the replies.

You said it better than I when you referenced 70% of the sound originating in the center channel. That is what I meant to say when I said surrounds don't contribute much. Of course surrounds contribute if not complete the HT experience. Don't we all remember the first time we had 5.1 and played Dolby Digital trailers just to hear the surround effect?

Having said that I think I may wait until the fall and order the M60 V3's, VP-180 and QS-8's all at once.

Greg


Originally Posted By: dakkon
i would say go with the vp-180 and M60's all the way.

as far as what you will gain..

side


this is only a physical comparison.. I had a VP-150 for many years, however when i recieved my 180.. it was a night and day difference... I sit 13 feet from the center channel. The intigration between my M60's and the 180 is almost perfect. The 150, is simply unable to keep up with the M60's.. I would say that the 150 would be a good match for the M22's.. However if you set up to towers then a 180 would be worth the money... I would actually wait on surrounds... keep in mind 70% or so of the sound in a movie come from the center channel... depending on how much TV you watch, few shows today are in true surround.. some are, and of those that i have experienced are not mixed that well...

If i was in your position, i would go for the 180/ M22's over the M60's and the VP-150.

if your budget will support the M60's and the 180, you can always move the M22's to perform surround duty.


Right now i have my M60's and VP-180 crossed over at 40hz, and set to large... This is partly due to my EP-600 amp being dead, and at Axiom, until i decide to buy a new amp.... however, even after the 600 is working again, i will probably stick with the 40hz cross over point.

Kind of long, but i tried to cover everything for you. I hope this helps.