Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Receiver Selection
#106225 07/27/05 02:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
I plan to buy a receiver for my speaker system. My budget is about 500 bucks.

My speaker configuration is:

Main: M22ti
Surrounds: QS4
Center: B&W VM1
Sub: Definitive ProSub 60

Which receiver can you recommend me within my budget?


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106226 07/27/05 02:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
I've had real good luck with Onkyo.(one stereo, one 5.1 and the current 7.1)

One vote for the TX SR602

Re: Receiver Selection
#106227 07/27/05 03:53 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
Ubid Denon 885 (2105) for 349.00.

Never mind. Their out of them. Check back next week for 2805, 2105. HK335

Last edited by bugbitten; 07/27/05 04:03 AM.
Re: Receiver Selection
#106228 07/27/05 03:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I have the Denon 2805, which is the same as the Denon 985, just sold from different channels. There is also a 2105. It really depends on if your buying refurbished or not. I think for that price range you will be able to find something nice. I would stay with Onkyo, Denon, HK, but Pioneer Elite and Yamaha's aren't bad either.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Receiver Selection
#106229 07/27/05 04:17 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 340
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 340
Go refurbished.

direct from harman kardon

In spite of getting a broken refurb(and hearing others with the same problems), the lengths they've gone through to help me(they've probably paid more for fast shipping both ways than I did for the whole receiver), and the quality of their receivers, I can't help recommending them.



Re: Receiver Selection
#106230 07/27/05 04:31 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Em, using new units, two excellent ones that immediately come to mind within your budget are the Pioneer 1015 and the Yamaha 5890. Others include the Denon 2105, HK 335 and Onkyo 602. If a refurbished unit was bought, the possibilities would be expanded. All of these will provide audibly flawless amplification, so choose the features which are most important to you.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Receiver Selection
#106231 07/27/05 11:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 86
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 86
I just went through the questions and research for 2 weeks and with help of many on this board & advice from the axiom techs I decided for now on the Denon avr 885 from UBID. They do go pretty fast but they always seem to get more in so keep checking the site . The price is 369.00 it just can't be beat. I really wanted the H/K 7300 but could not do it the current budget restrictions. All the reviews I have read gave this amp good rating. Besides while the H/K are great reicievers they are not with out some problems as you will notice with other posting around these boards. I have rarely seen a problem with the Denon line. Also the Pioneer 1015 looked really good but most were out of them for now. Of course I wanted to get my HT set up now, so went with the 885 that is being delivered today!
Hope this helps.
Peace

Re: Receiver Selection
#106232 07/27/05 08:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 946
Likes: 2
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 946
Likes: 2
I purchased a refurbished Denon AVR-885 from ecost.com and love it! I think you will enjoy this unit. Good luck!

Re: Receiver Selection
#106233 07/27/05 09:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 86
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 86
Thanks- just did the install-still testing but man, does this thing rock!

Re: Receiver Selection
#106234 07/28/05 12:58 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 205
local
Offline
local
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 205
Did you see the power ratings from Sound&Vision on the AVR 7300?

5 channels driven @8ohms 145 Watts
7 channels driven @8ohms 139 Watts
2 channels driven @8ohms 181 Watts
2 channels driven @4ohms 290 Watts
These are maximum power when distortion starts.
Jeez, who needs seperates with that kind of power.


M80ti's, VP150, QS8's
Re: Receiver Selection
#106235 07/28/05 02:29 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>Jeez, who needs seperates with that kind of power.

Geez, I know lots of people

Dennis (Tharkun), do you want to say a few words ?

Last edited by bridgman; 07/28/05 02:36 AM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Receiver Selection
#106236 07/28/05 02:46 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 205
local
Offline
local
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 205
Actually I am bidding on a Parasound amp right now. Jejejeje.


M80ti's, VP150, QS8's
Re: Receiver Selection
#106237 07/28/05 11:55 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833

There are quite a few more of us that are pushing the M80s with 200 to 300 watt amps.


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Receiver Selection
#106238 07/29/05 12:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
Yes. Like my Outlaw M200s.

Re: Receiver Selection
#106239 07/29/05 12:22 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833



Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Receiver Selection
#106240 07/29/05 12:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
85WPC

Re: Receiver Selection
#106241 07/29/05 06:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
In reply to:

85WPC



If you are creative like Peter you can confuse the electrons giving you more power than the specs list.

Re: Receiver Selection
#106242 07/29/05 07:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441


Re: Receiver Selection
#106243 07/29/05 11:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
Already have:.....inverted the center AND the surrounds(all M3s)causing the input wires to enter at the top, giving a gravity assist to the electrons; it helps on the attack, but not much for sustain..........

Re: Receiver Selection
#106244 07/31/05 04:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks for all the replies. Since I was in a business trip, I was not able to reply the posts.

My favorite receiver list is,

Yamaha 5890,
Pioneer 56txi
Pioneer 54tx
HK 435 and 635.

But I removed HKs from my list because I realized that usually HKs have HW problem I mean that it seems their quality is not good enough.

Actually, power is not so important for me. Since I live in an apartment, I am not able to use all power of my speaker or receiver.

The important thing for me is very good automatic speaker calibration or set-up and good quality.

I know that 56TXi is very expensive but it looks very attractive. On the other hand I may push my budget a little bit more up(1 or 2 hundred bucks).

I do not plan to buy refurbished one.

Denons are good but they are more expensive.

The rest of the features such as DSP, Pro Logic etc. seem common for all receivers.

I forgot to say that my current speaker system is 5.1. The receiver I will buy should allow me (it it is 7.1) to use it as 5.1.


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106245 07/31/05 04:11 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I wouldn't remove the H/Ks. We've gotten a couple of reports of people with problems with refurbs, but my refurb is fine, and I haven't seen anyone here with a problem on a new one.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Receiver Selection
#106246 07/31/05 04:24 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
One more thing, 56txi and 5890 are THX certified. I guess Axiom speakers are not. Can I use this feature with axiom speakers? And does the THX feature really worth to be had.


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106247 07/31/05 04:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I agree with Ken, HK's are great receivers, the only thing that bothered me was the dial that glows in the dark. I'm picky and it bugged me while watching movies in the dark, ooooooohhhhhhh la laaaaa


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Receiver Selection
#106248 07/31/05 04:25 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Coool


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106249 07/31/05 04:28 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Em, you're right to not be overly concerned with power(even if you didn't live in an apartment)since all the receivers mentioned have more than enough for any likely need. My thought is also that there hasn't been so much of a quality control problem with HK that it should be removed from consideration. Of the others that you list, the 56TXi would have the fullest list of features, but the Yamaha 5890 would appear to be the best buy and would be my pick(the Pioneer 1015 mentioned before is also an excellent buy).

On your THX question, I'll add that the special processing isn't of much significance and similar things can be done without it. The THX certification however is a useful assurance of quality(although some without it may also meet the THX standards). Don't worry about "worth it", because the cost of the THX laboratory certification process is only a few dollars per unit.

Last edited by JohnK; 07/31/05 04:39 AM.

-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Receiver Selection
#106250 07/31/05 04:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
In reply to:

And does the THX feature really worth to be had



THX is over-rated.. i mean, most amps/receivers that are THX certified are usually good, but it dont make a receiver "bad" if its not THX certified.. its just a standard in the industry, set by Lucas Films, that means a particular receiver meets the qualifications to be certified. its not an actual DSP mode, or audio function.. it just means that the receiver meets all standards that Lucas thinks is best for viewing HIS movies..

please, do yourself a favor... dont base ANY decision on if a receiver is THX certified or not. its just an industry plot to make guys like us feel obligated to pay more for a receiver..

good luck in your decisions..

and not to confuse you even more.. but i saw on Ecost.com, the Onkyo 601 was only $240 bucks.. thats a great deal on a real good receiver.

bigjohn

Last edited by bigjohn; 07/31/05 04:37 AM.

EXCUSE ME, ARE YOU THE SINGING BUSH??
Re: Receiver Selection
#106251 07/31/05 04:39 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks.

Maybe I wait for several months. Within this time frame, the price of 56txi may go down then I can afford it. Otherwise I will go with 5890.


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106252 07/31/05 04:41 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks big for the clarification.




Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106253 07/31/05 05:20 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>HK's are great receivers, the only thing that bothered me was the dial that glows in the dark. I'm picky and it bugged me while watching movies in the dark,

On my HK630 there are three levels on the "dim" cycle and the lowest turns off the blue dial. Only the power switch remains glowing and it's pretty small/dim. I think this is the case for the whole HK line but will confirm tomorrow.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Receiver Selection
#106254 07/31/05 05:30 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
John, my hk230's volume control will not dim under any circumstances.Your hk 630 can? The only thing on my 230 that has a dimmer function is the front face panel. It will go from full, to half full to completely dark.

EDIT: My bad. The blue light special volume knob does in fact turn off when the avr is half or fully dimmed. It's that damn power switch that always remains lit no matter what.

Last edited by richeydog; 07/31/05 06:02 AM.

*Michael*
AV123 Refugee - X-LS Encore, X-Voce, X-Omnis, Elt-Dpa's
Denon AVR-591
Magnavox NB500MGX BDP

Re: Receiver Selection
#106255 07/31/05 05:33 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Bummer of a birthmark, Hal !!

I'll be visiting a couple of friends with HK130s tomorrow, will see what they do and post back. It would be a bit annoying if the dial stayed bright...

... then again, I'm reading more and more articles which say "don't put all the equipment at the front of the room, get it off to one side so the rack etc.. doesn't interfere with the sound", maybe it's time to move the receiver


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Receiver Selection
#106256 07/31/05 06:07 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
John, just edited my previous post. The blue volume dial on my hk230 does indeed dim in the same fashion as your hk630.


*Michael*
AV123 Refugee - X-LS Encore, X-Voce, X-Omnis, Elt-Dpa's
Denon AVR-591
Magnavox NB500MGX BDP

Re: Receiver Selection
#106257 07/31/05 06:14 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Ahh, that makes sense. I have, on occasion, been known to put a piece of black electrical tape over the power switch.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Receiver Selection
#106258 07/31/05 06:20 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
I've done that too. If only there was a way to disable the light on the power switch.......hmmmmmm


*Michael*
AV123 Refugee - X-LS Encore, X-Voce, X-Omnis, Elt-Dpa's
Denon AVR-591
Magnavox NB500MGX BDP

Re: Receiver Selection
#106259 07/31/05 07:09 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
C'mon you guys, just buy a 7200! The volume knob doesn't light up at all.


Actually, I kinda like the blue light on the dial and wish my 7200 had it. No, I'm not gonna trade anyone. . .


***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
Re: Receiver Selection
#106260 07/31/05 11:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
Didn't notice til just now; but I can turn off the Vol. ring on my Onkyo 602! Nothing else lighted but the display

(Think I like it better with the ring Nice to have a choice)

Re: Receiver Selection
#106261 07/31/05 11:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
I also just noticed that emedwhat had a question about Axiom Not being THX certified.

I think I have a reasonable handle on THX certs for speakers; but any of you guys with the real knowledge care to respond?

(This could be a real fun one to get into; theater history and all!)

Re: Receiver Selection
#106262 07/31/05 02:25 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 828
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 828
from indhomecinema.com
THX
No home theater trend is more misunderstood than THX. THX is a seal of approval for equipment and software, but not a particular decoding algorithm like Dolby Digital or DTS. There are detailed technical specifications applied to equipment or software in order for it to be THX certified. When you buy a THX certified piece of equipment, you are guarenteeing that this piece of equipment meets the THX standards. Here's an example of the specifications:

Speaker to subwoofer crossover frequency set to 80hz
Reequalization of higher frequencies to lower their output for a smoother sound
Equal high power for all five main amplified channels
Subwoofers able to properly handle low frequency effects
Diffused dipolar surround channels
Low equipment noise
It is important to realize that there are many pieces of high quality equipment that do not meet THX standards. For example, the Skywalker ranch sound studio uses non-THX certified B&W 802 speakers to monitor THX certified recordings. THX certification is not something that one should require when purchasing equipment. Because of the high cost, I do not recommend the purchase of THX certified equipment.

Recently, Lucasfilm created a new lower standard for equipment known as THX-select and renamed the original standard to THX Ultra. The only difference between the two specs is the size of the room



------------------------------------------------
Leave the gun, Take the canolis.
Re: Receiver Selection
#106263 08/01/05 02:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 552
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 552
Not trying to rock the boat, but Power does not equal Loud. I mean, that if you get more power, the sounds get better and not only louder. I have gone from a receiver to Rotel separates (before 2x130 and now 2x200 wpc) and I could tell the difference right away. More power does not hurt, in the contrary.... all this is for stereo, and I am not sure if this applies to HT as well.

P.S. I live in and apt. building too.


Axiom M60s, QS4s, VP100 Onkyo TX-SR804 Oppo 970HD Rotel RB-1080/RCD-1072 REL Q150E sub, PS 3
Re: Receiver Selection
#106264 08/01/05 02:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
thyname, I think I understood what you mean about power and loud. I looked at the issue from loud point of view.


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106265 08/01/05 04:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
I am still reading user manual of the receivers. I realized that some of them do not have digital to analog converter. What I mean for an instance AVR 635 has mp3 decoding feature, but 5890 does not. On the other hand, Pioneer 1015 has WMA9 decoding feature. My plan is to connect a media player such as Roku or I/O Data Link Player to a receiver and enjoy listening MP3 or WMA in surruond format. If a receiver does not have this kind of decoding capability, does it mean that I can not listen MP3 or WMA music in surround format.


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106266 08/02/05 07:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
What about Marantz SR 7500 or SR 8400? I know 8400 a little bit expensive but from performance point of view, do they match my axiom speakers (M22ti and WS4)?


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Re: Receiver Selection
#106267 09/16/05 03:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
regular
Offline
regular
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
Hey guys, this is my first post. I don't have Axiom speakers yet, but I'm planning on buying a M60ti surround set-up when I get back from Iraq. Gotta put some of that combat pay to good use =)

As for receivers, I really like my Denon. It's a couple years old (its only Dolby Digital 5.1), but it puts out 100w per channel and I've had no problems at all with it. In fact, I will probably keep it until I can upgrade to the Lexicon RV-8, which I hear is quite a steal at $7k =P

Re: Receiver Selection
#106268 09/16/05 03:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
Welcome Bigsarge72, you'll have a killer system whenever you get those speakers. Take care over there and get home safe!


Rick
Our Room

smile
Re: Receiver Selection
#106269 09/16/05 04:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
Welcome Sarge! Thank you, so much, for your service and your sacrifice. Get 'er done, and get home safe. Bless you.

I think your Denon will handle the Axioms fine. Their sensitivity makes them relatively easy speakers to drive.


Jack

"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
Re: Receiver Selection
#106270 09/17/05 05:41 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
regular
Offline
regular
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
Ok, had the wife check the model for me, because stuff like that bugs me when I can't remember, heh. It's a Denon AVR-3200 and it's 80 watts per channel, not the 100w I posted earlier. It will do until I can upgrade, but my speakers definitely need upgraded more than my receiver =P

Re: Receiver Selection
#106271 09/17/05 01:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
M
mwc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
M
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
The 3200 is an excellent receiver albeit out dated. I've had mine since 98' and it is still going strong. I'm using it in a bedroom theater setup and but for the fact that it did not do DTS, it would still be in my main system.

In spite of the fact that it is only (according to my owners manual) 85w in 5 channel mode (105w in 2 channels) I'm still amazed at how robust, clean and full my system sounds (with 5 KEF speakers + sub). The 3200 never seems to strain no matter what is thrown at it.


I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
Re: Receiver Selection
#106272 09/18/05 05:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
regular
Offline
regular
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
Yeah, after I save up enough to get a DTS receiver, I will move my current set-up (Denon 3200 + Klipsch Quintet surround system) into the bedroom for movies/music.

Re: Receiver Selection
#106273 10/20/05 03:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Finally, I decided to go with AVR300 and I ordered one from the nearly perfect list of Audiophile Systems. I hope I made my decision correctly. It is really expensive.


Arcam AVR300
M22ti
QS4 with FMS QS Stand
VP100
Definitive ProSub60
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,304 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4