Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138 Likes: 1
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138 Likes: 1 |
Seems like everyone here is a big fan and very knowledgable on Rotel, Denon, HK and Yamaha, how about Marantz? I've always been under the impression that they are high end units and have just discovered they have some very reasonably priced models. Any one have experience with them?
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Their feature set didn't tend to compare to similarly priced models from H/K, Denon, etc. Perhaps this has improved. Some say that they have better sound. I have my doubts about this.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649 |
I've owned a Marantz SR5200 for several years now, and with the exception of one problem that was apparently isolated to this particular model (and fixed with no hassle under the company's three year warranty), it's been worry free.
The upside to Marantz stuff is that it looks fabulous and it's built like a friggin' tank. The downside is that Marantz has been very slow to adopt some of the flexibility offered by other companies that has been standard for a while. As an example, it took them quite a while to come around to offering flexible crossover points rather than just the fixed 100hz that I've got on my SR5200.
The sound quality is excellent and I'm sure it's the equal of Denon or HK, but I'm not sure about Marantz' power claims. Mine is supposedly good for 90wpc, but I sincerely doubt that's with all channels driven. Still, it's more than enough power to fill my room, and the SR5200 (SR5500 is the equivalent now, I believe) really is only about halfway up the food chain.
One of the things you'll hear about Marantz is that they've traditionally focused on the sound rather than the bells and whistles. This may or may not be true. I love my receiver, but when the time comes to replace it I might look to Denon for a few more features.
M22ti mains, EP175 sub, VP150 center, QS4 surrounds
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138 Likes: 1
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138 Likes: 1 |
and the SR5200 (SR5500 is the equivalent now, I believe) really is only about halfway up the food chain.
Thank you for your input, so the above comment means they are considered a "lesser" component than Denon or HK?
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649 |
In reply to:
they are considered a "lesser" component than Denon or HK?
No, no, no. I certainly don't believe so, anyway. What I meant is that the 5500 is in the middle of Marantz's range. If you wanted the equivalent of, say, Denon's 3805, take a look at the SR8400.
M22ti mains, EP175 sub, VP150 center, QS4 surrounds
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
I think they used to be priced a bit higher than competing receivers for what seemed like the same features, but nowadays they seem quite competitive. Everything I have heard is good...
I used to own a big Marantz power amp which I still miss. Marantz is owned by Denon these days, isn't it ?
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158 |
I also have a 5200 (factory refurb) which has given me nothing but pure enjoyment for the past 3 years. I'd agree that in the past, Marantz seemed to be a little behind in adding bells and whistles, when compared to other manufacturers, but looking at their current offerings, they seem to have caught up. And they've always been known for performing exceptionally in both home theater and stereo applications.
As for power, Sound and Vision mag tested the 5400 (last years version of the 5500) which was rated at 90watts x 6 channels. Its output, measured with 5 channels driven until clipping (tested at 1 KHz into 8 Ohms / Clipping point = 0.3% THD + Noise (APR '01 - pg.44)) was 103 watts per channel, so it actually outputted higher than claimed. So you should rest easy there. Also keep in mind, I don't think Marantz design their receivers to push 4 Ohms, to if you have 4 Ohm speakers, you might want to look elsewhere.
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158 |
I don't think Marantz is owned by Denon, rather the electronics company that owns Denon recently bought Marantz, so they now have the same parent company.
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649 |
In reply to:
so it actually outputted higher than claimed
Cool! And that reminds me, heat hasn't been an issue at all. I was a little concerned about driving the 6ohm VP150, but it doesn't skip a beat. When I talked about the lack of a competitive feature set, I didn't mean silly stuff like the umpteen zillion surround presets you'll find on Yamaha receivers, or even the auto-setup (which Marantz apparently does offer now). My observation since I've been on this board is that Denon and H/K just seem to offer enormous flexibility in terms of personalizing and fine-tuning setup options. I don't know that they're really all that great (or even usable), but it's enough to make me a little envious.
mreed, if you're seriously considering a Marantz receiver I don't think you'll be disappointed at all. It's handsome gear that's made well and sounds great. Plus, it's a little different -- I think I can probably count the number of Marantz owners on this board with one hand and have fingers left over.
M22ti mains, EP175 sub, VP150 center, QS4 surrounds
|
|
|
Re: Anybody have opinion on Marantz recievers?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138 Likes: 1
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138 Likes: 1 |
Boy I sure do appreciate everyone's input. Sound and power are more important to me than bells and whistles but I'm not seeing any phono inputs on these midpriced Marantz receivers. I am correct in assuming that it must actually be labled phono?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,949
Posts442,509
Members15,619
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
717
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|