Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110001 09/06/05 03:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
Looks like were in agreement on lots of things....including how poor most theaters sound in comparison with a good home system

Glad to hear that I'm not alone on the desire for more full-range speakers,too!!
Rich.

Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110002 09/06/05 01:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
local
OP Offline
local
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Thanks for the input everyone.

My room is very narrow - about 7 feet seperating the surrounds. Maybe I need to go with the QS4s.

95% music in use.

The M2s would stick out more AND need about 2-3 inches behind them for their bass to sound right I believe. I might knowck my head on them daily if I go that direction.

DARN


M22s, QS4s, M2 center, Hsu stf-1.
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110003 09/06/05 01:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
let's see;.....if I had to choose between a questionable sound difference in a smaller room, and bumps bruses and contusions, I know for sure what I'd pick!

Far fewer sharp edges on the QS series alright

Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110004 09/06/05 01:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
local
OP Offline
local
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Funny, they don't advertise the lack of sharp edges on the product information page!

The QS4s are smaller - or at least look much smaller than the M2s with their slopes - so - maybe I will just buy one at a time from b-stock.


M22s, QS4s, M2 center, Hsu stf-1.
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110005 09/06/05 03:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>95% music in use.

If your system is going to be used for 95% music then it might make more sense to configure a 5.1 music system instead, with M2s behind the couch rather than beside it. That will take better advantage of the room size, will be ideal for music, and will also be pretty decent (but not ideal) for movies.

Do you have some distance behind the couch ?


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110006 09/06/05 04:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
local
OP Offline
local
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Hmm

The way it is set up now - the M22s are slightly in front of the couch, the M2 is over the couch, the Athena surrounds are about 10 feet away. In other words - the M22s are aimed away from the couch, as is the M2 - toward where I sit.

My wife is usually on the couch and doesn't care about surround sound. I usually sit at the dining room table which is more or less between the surrounds.

The kitchen is in back of me - back wall is about 12 feet behind me.

I could possibly put M2s back there instead of QS4s parrellel with my head. They would be a ways back though.


M22s, QS4s, M2 center, Hsu stf-1.
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110007 09/06/05 04:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
local
OP Offline
local
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Against my better judgment - here is the living room / dining room as taken from the kitchen - after a month or so of my two year old redecorating and no guests coming over. (what a mess).

Picture taken from the kitchen. Just a link - not a picture - I have some shame!

http://www.8th-day.org/contactus.htm - look at the bottom of the page.


M22s, QS4s, M2 center, Hsu stf-1.
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110008 09/06/05 05:33 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339

Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110009 09/06/05 05:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Ahh, now I get it. I wrongly assumed the couch was the primary listening position, so substitute "sweet spot" everywhere I said couch

If you were going to do heavy movie watching I would say that is DEFINITELY a room that would take full advantage of QS surrounds. For mostly music, though, I'm not so sure...

If you are pretty sure you are going to stay mostly with music I would go for M2s behind you, either on the back wall or the side walls.

If you wanted a "least cost" experiment for music you could try :

- make sure the receiver can handle "phantom center", ie setting the center speaker to NONE splits the signal between the mains

- pick up a single M2 and use your existing center to get a pair

- mount the two speakers well behind you on the side walls if possible

Again, if there is any chance of your family watching relatively more movies you are probably better off going with QSs...


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: QS4s or M2s for surrounds
#110010 09/06/05 07:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
local
OP Offline
local
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Convenient link added by bugbitten -

oh darn - now even more people will see it!

Actually, thanks for the link Bugbitten.

Last edited by donaldekelly; 09/06/05 07:32 PM.

M22s, QS4s, M2 center, Hsu stf-1.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,076 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4