Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11709 06/05/03 11:36 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Jason, your basic question was about sound quality. There's no reason for competently engineered receivers or separates operating within their power limits to audibly change the sound of your recordings, speakers and listening room. Features and flexibility for the future may be reasons to consider separates, but sound quality isn't.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11710 06/06/03 06:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 485
J
JBG Offline
devotee
Offline
devotee
J
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 485
I would have to entirly disagree with you on that point.
i'm really positive that differences donot only remain on features and power ratings, however the answer to his original question remains unanswered, does a particular gear have any "sound quality" differences over an other particular gear.


7.1.4 * MRX1120 * M100s * 180HP * 4x M3-on walls * 4x M3-IC * dual XV15se * Shakers
Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11711 06/06/03 03:12 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
In reply to:

his original question remains unanswered, does a particular gear have any "sound quality" differences over an other particular gear



Actually jasonf's original question was:
Would the sound quality be much better with the monoblocks and Rotel over the Denon?
The only person who can answer that question IS jasonf.

Otherwise all you can do is debate whether the separates have any advantages/disadvantages in regards to features compared to integrated components which is exactly where this thread went.


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11712 06/06/03 03:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
This is again a very subjective and personal view so again always take my opinion with a grain of salt. I personally have listened to my speakers with Krell KAV separates Integrated and AMP @ 250w per channel and compared them against my Rotel RSP-1065 5 x 100 receiver.
To my ear what I found in MY regular stereo music listening levels 50-80db it was hard to decern the difference. My mind thought the Krell had a little more detail. That was it. The soundstage seemed equally as big and deep. In the lower listening levels I could discern that the Krell had more detail. Why? I do not know. Maybe the Rotel 1065 (which isn't a slouch) did not process low level sounds as well. When I turned the Rotel up to the higher levels it did seem the receiver was definitely working hard. My volume level was cranked up to like 68+ something. I never recorded the actual db on the spl. The Krell at those levels presented the sound with greater efficiency and I do not think the amp was anywhere as hot as the ROtel. This is the reason why I have also been looking at the IRD monoblocks. Again I am not looking into theses monoblocks for the sake of getting a better sound. I am looking into them due to the fact that in DTS or DD mode I have my volume up to 70+ and I think I am working the 1065. By having separate power to each speakers it would let the receiver work less. Since the canadian dollar is high, purchasing the IRD monoblock seem like a great deal. Also I can easily see that my current speakers are not as efficient as the Axioms and the Monitor Audio speakers (I used to have the Silver S6)

Saturn

Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11713 06/06/03 04:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
hey rcvecc;

Do you think I would need a separate electrical circuit for my system? I have the Tripp Lite LC2400 and it supposedly pushes as much as 2400W continuous. If I drain as much as than from any standard electrical socket in my living room should I worry?



Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11714 06/06/03 05:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 46
dwm Offline
buff
Offline
buff
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 46
Most 'standard' outlets are on a 15 amp circuit, so 2400W continous would trip the breaker. However, you're unlikely to draw that much power on average. All my gear in the family room is on one 15 amp circuit, and I haven't tripped the breaker. Sony WEGA TV, Sunfire Ultimate Receiver, Sunfire True Subwoofer Signature, Axiom M80ti mains, Axiom VP150 center, three Axiom QS8 surrounds, VCR, DVD player, ReplayTV box, DirecTV HDTV receiver, two HTPCs (one P4 1.8GHz, one EPIA M9000), wireless ethernet hub, wired 8-port 10/100 ethernet switch, Sony Playstation2.


Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11715 06/06/03 09:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
I hope I don't trip it when I get my 3 x IRD monoblocks to power the front which is 400W each.
Today that Tripp Lite is powering

Rotel RSX1065 550W
Marantz SE67 Cd player
Malata DV520 DVD/Kareoke
Panny VCR
HTPC 200W
Infocus X1 Projector
PMC DB1
PMC TB2 center
Axiom M3TI
Mirage Bi-Polar 150 Subwoofer
Sony G400 19" CRT
BenQ 17" LCD
Dell laptop
2 other network PC and servers
Altec Lansing sattelite and woofer speakers
fishtank pump, heater and air pump
notorios Halogen lamp - used to flip the circuit breaker before the Tripp Lite
clothes iron which my fiancee occasionally plugs in to a power bar attached to the Trip Lite
a vacuum cleaner which is also plug into that power bar on the weekends.

You think I'm heading towards a disaster? And my hydro is included in the maintenance so I'm safe for the time being.

Saturn



Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11716 06/06/03 10:16 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
Heh-heh... Let's not forget that a well-engineered monoblocks and separates (including the IRD) are BEAUTIFUL inside, even if it has nothing to do with the sound quality.

Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11717 06/06/03 11:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
hey saturn,i honestly can not answer your question,i had three circuts installed behind my system because i took a total of amps my system would draw at peak and over did them a little for future upgrades ,total amps were around 26 at peak,so i figured better safe than sorry

Re: Monoblocks or Receiver
#11718 06/07/03 01:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 46
dwm Offline
buff
Offline
buff
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 46
You're begging to trip the breaker, yes, especially if your vacuum is a modern high-powered unit. Even a 20 amp circult is probably borderline.

If it were me, I'd move the halogen lamp, the computers and the fisk tank gear to a separate 15 amp circuit, and buy a small UPS (say 1000VA) for the computers and fish tank. Then you can plug the iron and vacuum into this circuit; if the breaker trips, your computers will run for a while from UPS, and if they're sleeping, your aquarium gear will keep running for a long time (probably hours). Handy if an electrical storm trips a breaker or GFCI while you're at work or sleeping.

Here's a tip... if you want to know what you're drawing, pick up a line conditioner that has a built-in ammeter. I have a few in my computer and music racks, my favorites (for value) are the ART PS 4x4. $99.99 from samash.com. 8 outlets, retractable rack lighting with dimmer and on/off switch, built-in 15A breaker and front-panel on/off switch, analog voltmeter (input) and ammeter on front. You can get much nicer ones (sequencing, etc.), but they cost more.


Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,026 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4