C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 100
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 100 |
I have been looking in the internet, but I havent found a good response, but I know I am not the best web searcher around, so I will take the shortcut and ask this forum:
I am trying to find the definitions of the A & C weights, found in the RatShack SPL meters and some amps specs (for example, the Outlaw 770 I own specifies S/N of 119dB A-weighted).
Also about noise, I got confused in an article that says that the white and pink noise differs in the freq. spectra that each one carries, but did not specified the freq range or any other thing about it. In one of the papers I read, I kind of understood that pink noise is just between 20Hz-20KHz, and white noise is all over the place. Is that right? is noise just a sum of sine waves in all frequencies or there is something else in noise generators?
If anyone can throw an explanation or a link where I can learn this concepts, I'll appreciate it.
Thanks
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13 |
Choosing the 'C' weighting will make the meter respond more-or-less uniformly over the frequency range from 32 - 10,000 Hz, and the 'A' weighting will make the meter more sensitive to frequencies in the range 500-10,000 Hz. The response switch allows for changing the speed of the meter's response from 'SLOW' to 'FAST'. A slow response setting will make the meter less sensitive to rapid changes in sound level and can be used for measuring average pressure levels. The 'fast' setting is more useful when peak sound levels are being measured since in this mode, the meter will respond to very rapid changes in pressure level.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13 |
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
Pink noise and white noise are both random signals containing all frequencies -- you can think of the difference in terms of the two being EQ'ed differently. Let's take two frequency ranges -- 100-200 Hz and 1000-2000 Hz -- for the example.
Pink noise is equal energy per octave, so the 100-200Hz range would have the same total energy as 1000-2000 Hz since both are an octave.
White noise is equal energy per "number of hz", so the 100-200 Hz range would have one-tenth the energy of the 1000-2000 Hz range. In other words, white noise has louder "high notes" and sounds like the treble is turned way up relative to pink noise
From an audio point of view, pink noise is "flat" across the frequency range and makes more sense for us to use as a reference. The main point of interest with white noise is that it "occurs naturally", ie the noise you get from a radio between channels, the noise you get when you point a radio telescope out into space, the thermal noise you get in an electronic circuit etc...
Last edited by bridgman; 01/02/06 05:25 AM.
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
White noise (of the type that John refers to) is quite literally the sound of the big bang. So cool...
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
And waterfalls, explosions, rubbing a stick against a sidewalk and other naturally occuring sources of noise.
Bren R.
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Rubbing a stick on the sidewalk ain't gonna produce static on a TV...
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1 |
In reply to:
Rubbing a stick on the sidewalk ain't gonna produce static on a TV...
. . .but it sure is fun. For some, I suppose. . .err. . .nevermind.
*********** "Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
|
|
|
Re: C-weighted , A-weighted ???
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
In reply to:
Rubbing a stick on the sidewalk ain't gonna produce static on a TV...
But.. that... not... the idea behind... statement... no sense....
Ouch. My brain.
Bren R.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,494
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
832
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|