Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14988 07/16/03 07:51 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
On the other hand, passing it through a tape output would take out the processing part that it would go through on the pre-outs. But it would still be an extra layer of wires (or whatever).

I use the tape outs to pass unprocessed sound to my TV speakers (for casual watching, mind you, not movies)


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14989 07/16/03 07:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
The true "Direct" mode should bypass all A/D and D/A converters and associated circuits in the receiver, so that it works like a good'n'old pure-analog integrated amp. But many of today's AV receivers don't do that anymore. For example, my Elite 45TX leaves the bass management (done in the digital domain) engaged even in the Direct mode. So, my take is, the availability of the "Direct" mode is often for the marketing purposes only.

Back to BigWill's experience, my first guess would be that the remarkable difference in sound quality was mostly due to difference in room acoustics and speaker placement. Or was it heard under identical conditions with respect to the room and placement?


Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14990 07/16/03 08:34 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
BigWill Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
No scientific listening conditions. The room appeared to be heavily dampened with sound absorbing material and it was smaller than both my family room and the listening room at Tweeter's where I heard the Viennas.

I looked up Parasound gear on the web and found the model # - P3 with an A23 amp. MSRP was $800/900 respectively. Saw the P3 for as low as $600 plus shipping on the web. Their multi channel preamps are definitely out of the question $4000-$6000.

So it sounds like I would need to add some M22s or M80s into my family room in order to have two separate systems. Don't know if the wife will let me get away with that one.



Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14991 07/16/03 09:47 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
In reply to:

I looked up Parasound gear on the web and found the model # - P3 with an A23 amp. MSRP was $800/900 respectively. Saw the P3 for as low as $600 plus shipping on the web. Their multi channel preamps are definitely out of the question $4000-$6000.



Those Parasound Halo amps look astounding. I found some on audiogon for about 10-20% off the retail price and the units were not that old (less than a couple of months). However, they sold rather quickly. Perhaps something to drive a future system with...


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14992 07/17/03 07:55 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
There...did it. (pmbuko will understand!) LOL!

Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14993 07/17/03 06:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I understand only too well.

Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14994 10/18/03 04:16 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 604
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 604
In reply to:

There...did it. (pmbuko will understand!) LOL!


TELL US TELL US!!!! Suspense is evil!!


Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14995 10/18/03 05:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
Hi Sushi
I think the direct mode is best suited for DVD Audio and SACD. There are many 2 channel SACD recordings as well as multichannel offerings.


Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14996 10/18/03 05:47 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Will, "it" is being on top of all 5 boards simultaneously. Craig, Peter, Ken and a few others have achieved this distinction. The prize is a lifetime free subscription to the Axiom Newsletter.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14997 10/18/03 02:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 604
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 604
In reply to:

Will, "it" is being on top of all 5 boards simultaneously. Craig, Peter, Ken and a few others have achieved this distinction. The prize is a lifetime free subscription to the Axiom Newsletter.


Ahh, cool enough. Heh - kidding though right? Because the newsletter's free.

I thought the newsletter was free though - hmm; or is there another newsletter besides the email one?

Too much brain activity on a Saturday morning .


Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,007 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4