Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 2-Channel vs. AV Receiver for Stereo
Craig_P #150626 12/29/06 01:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
G
newbie
Offline
newbie
G
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
I have a brand new pair of M60s and am looking to upgrade my existing stereo receiver, a Radio Shack Optimus STA-2170, to a Harman-Kardon HK3480. This system is for stereo music only since I already have an Onkyo based HT upstairs. One thing this forum thread has made me wonder, however, is how much better the newer HK receiver will sound vs. the "vintage" RS one. The RS is 100w/ch (full info at http://support.radioshack.com/support_audio/26927.htm) and has performed well over the years, though I can't help but feel that a modern receiver like the HK should outclass it fairly easily. If I decide to go for it, I'll try to remember to report what I hear here.

Last edited by gildahl; 12/29/06 01:53 PM.
Re: 2-Channel vs. AV Receiver for Stereo
gildahl #150627 12/30/06 11:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 157
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 157
I can't say much about the radio shack receiver that you currently have, but I've had the HK3480 for a year or two now paired with M60's and I've been very impressed. No matter what volume I choose it always sounds great. In fact, I occasionally use it as a 2.0 home theater system and it sounds wonderful there too!

One question though. Why do you feel the need to upgrade your receiver? Do you feel that there's something lacking in your current setup?


M60's
VP150
QS8's
HSU STF-2
Onkyo TX-SR805
Audiobytes for the PC
Re: 2-Channel vs. AV Receiver for Stereo
Wegiz #150628 01/08/07 07:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
G
newbie
Offline
newbie
G
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Well I went ahead and got the HK. I'm ashamed to say it but part of my reasoning to make the purchase was because of laziness. The old RS unit has no remote. The HK not only has a remote, but has an IR port that permits me to sync volume and power to my Squeezebox through its IR blaster function. That's cool. With respect to the sound, the differences are subtle but noticeable. I'm still experimenting, but the HK seems to deliver a more impressive sense of space (soundstage). I could also be convinced that it has better clarity and cleaner bass, but since I don't have an A-B setup and don't fully trust my memory, I can't be one-hundred percent on this one. The VMAx (2-channel surround) feature is an interesting special-effect that's fun to play with, but largely unusable for any serious listening as it makes the music muddy and makes the sound so non-directional that it feels like it's in your head. I guess I can at least say that the RS unit was no slouch, but the HK is a worthwhile step up. Now I just have to figure out what to do with the old unit.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,034 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4