Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
Ken.C #154758 01/01/07 03:32 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
teanau Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
hmmm, i hope for my sake you are wrong john.
I was really banking on it being active bi-amping using the surround channels. interesting (not stupid) idea even if it isnt the case.

i think in surround mode it reverts to a bi-wire mode, as im still getting bass from my bass drivers.

its sad the manual is so vague,

_sam

Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
teanau #154759 01/01/07 03:46 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
There's no way it works like that (switching between bi-amp and bi-wire). It's just not feasible electrically speaking. Sorry, man.

However, here's a couple of articles on bi-amping and bi-wiring to look at:
bi-wiring
bi-amping


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
Ken.C #154760 01/01/07 04:10 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
teanau Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
why is there no reason it works like that?
if it doesnt then i agree it is extreme manufactuing stupidity!

surely its would just need to do what you do with twisted wires with relays inside?

biwire > one amp connected to both A and B outputs?
biamp > one amp to A (hi frequencies), one amp to b (low frequencies) this is exactly what they are claiming.

im sorry i just dont see the electrical limitations here, im not being confrontational, maybe naive? i recognise you guys are significantly more versed in this field than me.

my assumption (could be flawed) is that individual amps can be internally routed dynamically depending on the situation. why is this unfeasible?

thanks again for indulging me,
i genuinely appreciate it.
_sam

Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
teanau #154761 01/01/07 04:13 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Usually amps are directly connected to the outputs. I assume that this was a relatively inexpensive receiver, so I am making the further assumption there is no way they would put a feature on it that is not available on much more expensive receivers.

So, lots of assumptions happening here, but the short of it is, even if it did work as you think, it wouldn't matter anyway. There are no performance benefits from bi-amping with identical amps and without an external crossover. Likewise, there are no benefits from bi=wiring, unless you're the one selling the wire.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
teanau #154762 01/01/07 04:18 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Sam, there aren't any "individual amps" in a receiver. There're just several sets of output transistors(operating as valves)drawing on one power supply section. This can't increase the power available.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
JohnK #154763 01/01/07 04:31 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
teanau Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
oh, ouch, in that case i am sadly the victim of ambiguously optimistic marketing.

i regularly drool over this:
http://www.plinius.com/documents/downloads/plinius_odeonbrochure.pdf

and just assumed all multi channel amps are made the same.

well i think tomorrow im going to take a screwdriver to this piece of <censored>.... um entirely adequate consumer hardware.

thanks for your help.
and happy new year.
_sam

Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
teanau #154764 01/01/07 04:37 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Sorry to disappoint, Sam.

Happy new year to you, and don't hurt yourself while you are dealing with your entirely adequate consumer hardware. (been there, man...)


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: SA XR70 > RB1092
Ken.C #154765 01/12/07 04:59 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
teanau Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
the rb1092 arrived,
they either lace their packaging with some kind of twisted aphrodisiac, or it really is exactly what i was looking for.

ive been running my squeezebox 2 channels directly into it and dont expect to get out of my listening chair long enough to hook up my 5.1 for many days.

absolutely fantastic.
thanks for all your help
_sam

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,947
Posts442,495
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,841
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (2x6spds), 988 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4