Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 132
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 132 |
Axiom Desktop Series
D1 for the speakers. D for Desktop and 1 since they are smaller than M2s.
EP65 since the woofer is the 6.5" woofer from the M80.
You could then have the Epic Desktop 2.0 with a pair of D1s and outboard amp or the Epic Desktop 2.1 with the EP65 added in.
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Axiom Quantum Series + Axiom Collider (sub) or Axiom Impact (sub) Trouble with that is the numbering: Q1 gets confusing, what with the QS series. Oh well.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Obligatory-but-fruitless suggestions: Axiom Personal Series, Axiom Powered Series.
PZero for the mains (P implies both Personal and Powered)
Do I understand correctly that there has been a fundamental design change? My previous understanding was that this product would be available ONLY as a 2.1 set, with the amp and crossovers residing in the sub. This new scenario (a powered 2.0 set and optional, powered sub) sounds fantastic to me; there are certainly people like me who want great sound at the office, but don't necessarily require a sub, or desire the associated the expense or footprint. A powered, close-to-full-range pair of Axioms could have very broad application in separate zones (just plug in your squeezebox and there you go!).
However, such a scenario does imply multiple, separate amp modules and (at minimum) relocating the crossover from the sub to the sattelites. Sounds expensive.
That burled walnut is beyond sexxaaayyy.
"When?" indeed. Father's Day is coming.
Last edited by tomtuttle; 04/24/07 04:08 PM.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
regular
|
regular
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9 |
I am filling in for TrademarkBot who is out of service. PZero will have many people thinking of the Pirelli Zero performance tire. PZero
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041 |
Sat=Satellite Axiom Saturn Sat 1 Axiom Saturn Sat 2 Axiom Saturn Sat 3
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
regular
|
regular
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9 |
That was a quick edit. SpellingBot was watching you from his satellite.
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488 |
Good idea on the limit of 3 per person. I guess the 10,000 entires from the last contest was a big overwhelming eh? Axiom Soundbyte (for the satellites) or Audiobyte same difference really. Axiom Megabyte (for the sub) Axiom CSA-1 for "computer sourced audio"
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692 |
Axiom Meta Series - Meta-2, Meta-3, Meta-5 for Satellites; Meta-1 for Sub or MS-2, MS-3, MS-5 & MS-1 Axiom Binary Series - Bin2.0 or Bin2.1 Symmetry Series by Axiom - Symmetry implies either a quantitative equality of parts (the perfect symmetry of pairs of matched speakers) or a unified system of subordinate parts. Naming Convention: S2.0 for matched pair or S2.1 for system including sub. Here's one just for fun... Axiom's New HAL Series - "Yes, Ian, I can reproduce that..." Homage to 2001's infamous computer..." WhatFurrer
"Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup..."
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 340
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 340 |
Here are my three entries:
Prodigious Apache Rocket
Pioneer sc-1525 M80 HG Cherry
|
|
|
Re: Axiom Computer Speaker Naming Contest
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692 |
EDIT
Symmetry Series by Axiom - Symmetry implies either a quantitative equality of parts (the perfect symmetry of pairs of matched speakers) or a unified system of subordinate parts. Naming Convention: S2.0 for matched pair or S2.1 for system including sub OR Symmetry 2.0 or Symmetry 2.1, etc...
/EDIT
For some reason I did not get an edit function when I posted the above, so I had to resort to more straightforward means.
WhatFurrer
"Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup..."
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,494
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
832
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|