Axiom Home Page Forums General Discussion Technical Questions is it bad to tie cables together

I mentioned this before and it was disputed but I can say for certain that many a data circuit has been fixed by removing bad splice work. Because time is of essence, stripping, twisting and taping is too slow and if not tight and well taped can cause issues (looseness or corrosion.

We use splice connectors that don't require stripping and are gel filled to prevent corrosion. Yes, it's overkill for home audio and still a splice to the cable enthusiasts but another example of splices effecting transmittion came about when we started using b-wire connectors similar to these.


It was eventually discovered, after much frustration, that unless the techs crimped them with all of their might, the connection would eventually weaken and cause errors.

We went back to our original style, similar to these, and they remained reliable.



I'm a bit off track but what I was trying to say is that a solid connection is VERY important but a good, well taped twist should be more than sufficient if you can forget it's there.

Murph, thanks for clarifying the point I was trying to make.

Murph & Randy,

Agreed that extra care has to be taken with data circuits as they are higher speed and more prone to reflections as a result of potential impedance mismatch at the joint.

I actually would never recommend that data circuits be crimped but rather soldered or even better, replaced. And they should be tested end-to-end with an SWR meter. The problem out there is that many technicians that serviced audio circuits such as POTS are now also servicing data lines with the same techniques as audio. I'm not insinuating anything about you, Murph. I am expressing a little frustration on my end because these same technicians have caused me and my teams endless frustration over the years even though we've published very detailed instructions about the processes they must use to install DCEs and DTEs.

Audio speaker cables, being lower frequencies, are not susceptible to reflection in a way that can be detected by human hearing. Some use heatshrink over audio cable splices because they are worried about oxidation. I think this too is over-kill but it sure makes the connection look nice and provides for some stress relief.

Don't worry about insulting me Mojo, I'm not actually the guy out doing the work but I'm involved from many other angles.

I am curious though, would you consider your above advice solid in the Telecom world for outdoor purposes? I can't imagine trying to solder effectively while hanging from a pole during the rain or snow in order to attach two wires together.

This would have been the area where I was referring to? I work for Bell-Aliant, an income trust Telco tied to Bell Canada. Together we cover over 50% of Canada and I know that soldering is not used anywhere to join loops, feeder, distribution pairs etc. in the outdoor environments. Indoors there are generally patch panels so it becomes less of an issue.

Certainly solder is better but I am curious if standards in your area are so much better than ours. Also by "data Circuits", I would be referring to old school technologies like frame relay, datapac, etc. Not really 'high speed" depending on your standards. However, we certainly don't solder our copper pairs outdoors for ADSL service up to 10MB either. Anything faster than that is fiber.

We also found our most sensitive circuits to poor crimps were ones where radio stations relayed their remote broadcasts to their transmitting stations via our copper data lines but using analogue (not really data, but using data groomed copper.) This is still not comparable to a home environment as it involves long distances and other factors.

I agree with everything you said from a technical standpoint. However, because you seemed to feel so strongly about it, I would really like to understand if our standards are that far behind that of your geography's. It's an efficiency vs. quality thing for sure.

Also since I mentioned my company name, none of my post, in any way, reflects the views of my company or is in any way, representative of my company. and what ever else goes into the usual disclaimer clause.....

I think what I was trying to say is being misunderstood. I never said that there would be any noticable quality difference in the sound.

The only point I was trying to make is in regards to the quality of work. If people like twisting 3 strands of speaker wire togethor half assed, so be it.

I would feel much better having a professional looking job from end to end, especially if it will be concealed in a finished ceiling or wall long term. Yes, you can extend your speaker lengths by adding additional wire with no negative sound results. I would just assume people would take care to make nice twists and cover with appropriate tape or wire ends.

Our equipment gets installed on poles, electrical substations and head-end (office environments). Surprisingly, where we've had the majority of our splicing problems is in the office environment where soldering is easy to do. In the substation and pole-top environments, new cables are pulled most of the time. If they can't pull new cables, they will use ring or spade terminals with terminal blocks or male/female blades.

Hmm Interesting. Is your company a data only or telcomm as well.

Where we break off into buildings (loop), pairs are also generally placed on blocks at the tops of poles. However, directional changes from one direction to another (one cable count to another) are spliced due to necessity as they can be 500 or 1000 pair cables. We also solder in CO's where applicable.

Glad to see we were not that far off after all. I couldn't imagine a lineman up a pole trying to use an electric or butane soldering gun. I'm sure the safety implications themselves would prevent it.

Thanks for the conversation. Sorry for the hijack.

Nice to see some fellow telco folk on here. I work for AT&T (SBC) ((Southwestern Bell)). I'm an application developer supporting our Network Services department. A lot of the work I've been doing this year has revolved around the FTTP/FTTN product we're rolling out.

just to add to everyones comments, I think splicing to a surround speaker (such as the QS8) is perfectly fine, I would however, have second thoughts about doing that for my mains or my centre channel.

This is just my feeling, It wouldn't bother me TOO much to have a spliced wire to one of my QS8s...but I am a bit OCD since I got into this audio thing (just ask my wife, I drive her up the wall sometimes).