![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 25 |
I've heard the VP150V2 doesn't match quite as well with the M-60's, that in some slow pans you can hear the tonal difference. Any truth in this? I like having seamless imaging across the front stage, and wonder if this setup can do this. Please let me know.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Do you have an example of something that does these slow pans (other than pink noise?) I am curious. I have a VP100 and M80s... probably not a great match. ![](/boards/images/graemlins/wink.gif) The only time I notice an issue is with live broadcasts (auto racing) where they mysteriously place the commentator's voice on the left front for a second instead of the center. It's probably the decoding I'm using, though.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 51
buff
|
buff
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 51 |
I don't have the VP150, but the VP100 with M60's and the tonal match it perfect. I have been thinking of upgrading to the 150 though, so I would like to know this as well. Reason for upgrade is my room is rather large and really need the 150 and QS8's over the 100 and QS4's I have now.
Bill3508
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
The only DVDs I've been watching lately are Battlestar Galactica. I have not noticed any panning issues with my oddly matched speakers (now that I'm thinking about it).
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 25
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 25 |
Quote:
Do you have an example of something that does these slow pans (other than pink noise?) I am curious. I have a VP100 and M80s... probably not a great match. The only time I notice an issue is with live broadcasts (auto racing) where they mysteriously place the commentator's voice on the left front for a second instead of the center. It's probably the decoding I'm using, though.
Sorry,I don't have an example. It's just somethig someone mentioned to me b/c its not an exact match. i want to be sure before i do though. im seriously thinking of getting axiom m60's vp150, with qs8's, but haven't pulled the trigger yet. just trying to get my questions answered first.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 110
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 110 |
I'm not entirely sure what timbre matching is but I can tell you that I've noticed a serious difference in the sound of voices during some quick pans during some action scenes that have a lot of talking in them. It can be distracting but it is kinda rare. I know someone who actually replaced his 150 with a klipsch speaker(RC-64) and he claims that it sounds incredible and blends well with his M80's. Honestly, I've always been a little dissapointed with axioms centers. Just a little, though.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
I've never had an issue with my VP150 and my M60s.
Keep in mind that even if you use 3 identical front speakers, they're likely to sound different on test material just because of different room reactions, proximity effect variables, etc. It's not something that you would normally hear with program material, however.
As the room and the placement of the center have such a large effect on the sound, I would just try a VP150 in your own room. That's why the 30-day trial exists...
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,841 Likes: 13 |
I've owned M60's with a VP150 in the past and currently have m80v2's with vp150v2's and have never had any issue with timber matching or voice changes. Most of the dialog comes from the center channel, not the left/right, that is the point.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853 |
Quote:
I've heard the VP150V2 doesn't match quite as well with the M-60's, that in some slow pans you can hear the tonal difference. Any truth in this? I like having seamless imaging across the front stage, and wonder if this setup can do this. Please let me know.
There is no such thing as perfect timbre. 3 identical speakers across the same plane will give you the closest timbre match but that isn't a practical alternative for most so a horizontal speaker with similar drivers is the next best alternative. If you run sine waves through each of the 3 front speakers you will hear a slight change in tonality. Sometimes just moving the mains slightly or changing the height of the horizontal speaker will tighten up the timbre.
The VP100/150s timbre match up as much as possible with all the Axiom speakers given their shape, crossover networks and similar drivers. How those speakers interact acoustically in your room also affects timbre and that can be controlled somewhat with attention to placement and treatments.
John
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: VP150v2 Timbre Match ?
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422 |
I've got the VP150, with M60 fronts, and QS8 surrounds. I think that it is a pretty solid system. Keep in mind that many people (myself included) have the ability to adjust speaker settings quite a bit at the receiver or pre-amp area. That could be a reason for any perceived tonal differences. As an extreme example, you could not use a sub, and pump everything to the R/L fronts with a "boost" in dB on the receiver, and then set the center channel to be less "boosted" in volume, and be set to "small" or some other obviously non-matching setting.
Then it would sound pretty bad in regards to a smooth sound field.
Farewell - June 4, 2020
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,947
Posts442,495
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
777
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|