Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Calling Jakeman...
EFalardeau #179116 10/16/07 03:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
Hutzal Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
like he mentioned, he wanted a uniform bass response in his whole room, and really, the only way to accomplish that is with a subwoofer on each wall.


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Re: Calling Jakeman...
Hutzal #179121 10/16/07 03:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
 Originally Posted By: Hutzal
In my room, I found the most significant sonic benefit comes from having dual subs on opposing side walls and I recommend that for anyone's HT. After that, well it gets better with more subs but with diminishing returns.
[/i]

Since having 2 subs on opposite walls made the most difference, I am not sure having 4 EP400's would be worth it...


Why not? you would then have dual EP400s on opposite walls achieving what he found to be the most beneficial.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Calling Jakeman...
jakewash #179129 10/16/07 04:32 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I'm curious how the EP400 fits in anywhere. Does anyone on the boards have one? (I mean, other than Amie, Ian, Alan, etc...)


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Calling Jakeman...
Ken.C #179131 10/16/07 04:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
NADishman has one. I'm not sure about any others. I'd love to get my hands on one and do a side-by-side comparison with the 600. It's common knowledge that the sub used to be ported and now it's sealed. It's this in particular that has me intrigued.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Calling Jakeman...
Hutzal #179135 10/16/07 05:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
4 400s would make for an incredible audio system. a 500 plays twice as loudly as a 400 ie. 106db vs. 109db anechoic but has the same extension and what looks like a 12db rolloff per octave rather than brickwall digital filters at 100hz in the 500/600. In some applications, especially with monitors that sloping rolloff can be helpful when blending one sub with speakers. On the other hand multiple subs with long rolloffs can pose a challenge for the mid-high bass output of the mains. The brickwall filters with their steep rolloffs are very useful in keeping sub sound and harmonics out of the higher frequencies which is the job of the speakers. That rolloff characteristic would more than anything distinguish the sonic qualities of the 400 compared to the other EP subs. The 400 has slightly less extension and much less output than the bigger subs but with four I would rule out output as a limiting factor in any room. Heck just a pair of them would make a big impact in any but the largest rooms.

From the perspective of smoothing FR no question four 400s would be just as effective as four 500s or 600s. Without actually testing these subs I'm hesitate to update that table. However I would venture that a system with 4 400s could overall make a better sonic presentation than a pair of EP600s because of their ability to flatten room nodes. The giveup would be in 3hz of extension favouring the 600s. Output would not necessarily be compromised because of coupling among the subs. Two subs potentially can increase output up to 6db depending on distance between them while 4 subs have the potential to add up to a further 12db.

Could be an interesting followup project...


John
Re: Calling Jakeman...
jakeman #179137 10/16/07 05:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Jake,

I'd be grateful if you can point me to your table.

The advantage of higher frequency harmonics in the sub is the "snap" or "slam" that is heard as the stick or foot-pedal strikes the drumskin. I am snap/slam-challenged right now...even when I turn my receiver right up (I saw that coming, Rick \:\) ).


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Calling Jakeman...
Mojo #179139 10/16/07 05:22 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
That's high frequency enough it should be handled by your mains.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Calling Jakeman...
Mojo #179140 10/16/07 05:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
Hi Mojo,

Its more a list which was reproduced earlier in this thread that came about after months of testing and listening to the various configurations. Its a tough call on whether the higher harmonics add or detract since it depends how well you have the sub(s) blended with the mains. The further a sub from the mains the more phase becomes a factor at the higher harmonics. The 500/600 brickwall filters removes the above 100hz harmonics which may or may not be an advantage depending on your room and speakers.

Right after FR and distortion, I find the transient response of the sub to be a big factor in hearing the snap/slam. Its often stated that sealed subs have an advantage in TR but that is a generality and their are many exceptions. In the listening tests I have had with other subs, the EP subs were far more "musical" than other ported subs though I see more manufacturers now focussed on this important aspect of sound quality. I'm curious to see how a sealed 400 would sound compared to a ported 500 with regards to snap. I might try to get ahold of one for some comparisons.


John
Re: Calling Jakeman...
jakeman #179142 10/16/07 05:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
Hutzal Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
"I might try to get ahold of one for some comparisons."

Thats what I am talking about...but only 1??????!?? \:\)


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Re: Calling Jakeman...
Ken.C #179143 10/16/07 05:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Maybe. I'm not ready to debate "snap/slam" at this time. Let's just say that this is the final dimension that I am personally missing in my environment. Frankly I am not very happy about it but I am patiently exploring various options.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (Cork), 1,306 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4