Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
MarkSJohnson #217064 08/02/08 03:03 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Funy thing is that it usually works for me. I thought it was the same as the old one.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
Ken.C #217066 08/02/08 04:16 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
I tried some simple searches for old topics that had rare words in them, not used often like some obscure speaker brand name and i found nothing.
Yet if i go back to my very first fifty or so posts where i knew i had discussed the topic, i find it manually.

Even the Google search didn't find it so i lost all confidence in using the search function since the forums were updated.


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
chesseroo #217084 08/02/08 09:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Part of the problem is your only allowed to search within a 1 year gap now, so you have to adjust both time fields. For ex., older than 2 years and earlier than 3 years, pain in the you know what.....


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
chesseroo #217104 08/03/08 05:59 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I can still find a great post by searching for the keyword "torch", putting my name in the display name box, and searching posts older than 5 years and newer than 4.

Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
pmbuko #217105 08/03/08 06:07 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
When I think about you I torch myself.

Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
CV #217112 08/03/08 06:12 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
That sounds wonderfully painful.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
Ken.C #217156 08/04/08 12:07 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
My M80's are bi-amped. And I like it that way.

I had the extra channels on my amp and was using Canare 4S11 quad-cable anyway, so one afternoon (many months ago) I decided to bi-amp one channel to see if I could possibly tell a difference. Just split the RCA-outs from my AVR and fed them into 2 pairs of channels on my amp. Definitely didn't use any sort of external crossover.

Well, after a few CD's worth of L/R balance listening, I was actually preferring the bi-amped channel. I swapped the channels to make sure it wasn't the speaker, and still preferred the bi-amped channel. Believing full-well that it was just my imagination, I asked my wife for help and told her that I had re-wired one speaker, and asked which one she liked better. She too, picked out the bi-amped one. We both though the bi-amped channel was a bit 'fuller' on the bottom end. The bass was just a bit better and the sound was just, well, a tiny bit more pleasant. It was subtle, definitely, and not really apparent on every recording. We just preferred it.

So from that, I bi-amped both and my system has stayed that way ever since.


M80v2 | VP150v2 | QS8v2
SVS Pci+ 20-39
Emotiva UMC-1 & LPA-1
M22ti + T-Amp, in the Office
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
PeterChenoweth #217209 08/04/08 05:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
If it was a completely useless feature, then why would axiom include in on their speakers?


-David
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
terzaghi #217212 08/04/08 05:34 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Marketing.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
Ken.C #217222 08/04/08 06:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
What is being discussed above is not bi-amping. This article explains it in laymens terms.

http://www.gcaudio.com/resources/howtos/biamping.html


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 703 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4